Hypothesis Foamed surfactant solutions can clean surfaces! We hypothesise that the cleaning efficiency depends on the liquid fraction and on the stability of the foam. We also hypothesise that the cleaning efficiency is the better the smaller the average bubble size is. Experiments: The double syringe technique was used to generate foams with varying liquid fractions but the same, very small bubble sizes with and without perfluorohexane in the gas phase. We performed cleaning tests in which the foams were applied to glass substrates contaminated with a fluorescent oil. Findings: We found that unstable foams clean better than stable foams. Three cleaning mechanisms were identified: (1) imbibition at low liquid fractions, (2) wiping, i.e., shifting of the contact line between oil, foam and glass, at all liquid fractions, and (3) drainage at high liquid fractions. The change of the liquid fraction and of the foam stability lead to different combinations of these mechanisms and thus to different cleaning results.