Service interruption on Monday 11 July from 12:30 to 13:00: all the sites of the CCSD (HAL, Epiciences, SciencesConf, AureHAL) will be inaccessible (network hardware connection).
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research study

Abstract : Background: To assess the completeness of reporting, research transparency practices, and risk of selection and immortal bias in observational studies using routinely collected data for comparative effectiveness research. Method: We performed a meta-research study by searching PubMed for comparative effectiveness observational studies evaluating therapeutic interventions using routinely collected data published in high impact factor journals from 01/06/2018 to 30/06/2020. We assessed the reporting of the study design (i.e., eligibility, treatment assignment, and the start of follow-up). The risk of selection bias and immortal time bias was determined by assessing if the time of eligibility, the treatment assignment, and the start of follow-up were synchronized to mimic the randomization following the target trial emulation framework. Result: Seventy-seven articles were identified. Most studies evaluated pharmacological treatments (69%) with a median sample size of 24,000 individuals. In total, 20% of articles inadequately reported essential information of the study design. One-third of the articles (n = 25, 33%) raised some concerns because of unclear reporting (n = 6, 8%) or were at high risk of selection bias and/or immortal time bias (n = 19, 25%). Only five articles (25%) described a solution to mitigate these biases. Six articles (31%) discussed these biases in the limitations section. Conclusion: Reporting of essential information of study design in observational studies remained suboptimal. Selection bias and immortal time bias were common methodological issues that researchers and physicians should be aware of when interpreting the results of observational studies using routinely collected data.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-03472684
Contributor : Odile Malbec Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, December 9, 2021 - 2:36:16 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, April 7, 2022 - 1:58:14 PM

File

s12916-021-02151-w.pdf
Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Van Thu Nguyen, Mishelle Engleton, Mauricia Davison, Philippe Ravaud, Raphael Porcher, et al.. Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research study. BMC Medicine, BioMed Central, 2021, 19 (1), pp.279. ⟨10.1186/s12916-021-02151-w⟩. ⟨inserm-03472684⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

29

Files downloads

26