Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles BMJ Open Year : 2020

Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol

(1, 2) , (3, 4) , (1, 5) , (1, 5) , (5, 6) , (7) , (4) , (7) , (5) , (1, 6) , (8, 4, 9) , (2, 5, 6)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite the non-negligible weight loss failure rate at midterm, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains the reference procedure in the treatment of morbid obesity with metabolic comorbidities. A recently emerged procedure, the single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S), could be more effective on weight loss with similar morbidity and lower weight loss failure rate than RYGB. We propose the first randomised, open, multicentre superiority trial comparing the SADI-S to RYGB (SADISLEEVE). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The main objective is to demonstrate the superiority at 2 years after surgery of the SADI-S compared with RYGB in term of excess weight loss percentage. The secondary objectives are the evaluation of nutritional status, metabolic outcomes, overall complication rates and quality of life, within 2 years after surgery. Key inclusion criteria are obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m(2) or ≥35 kg/m(2) with at least one comorbid condition and candidate to a first bariatric procedure or after failure of sleeve gastrectomy. Patients randomised by minimisation in two arms, based on centre, surgery as a revisional procedure, presence of type 2 diabetes and BMI \textgreater50 kg/m(2) will be included over 2 years.A sample size of 166 patients in each group will have a power of 90% to detect a probability of 0.603 that excess weight loss in the RYGB arm is less than excess weight loss in the SADI-S arm with a 5% two-sided significance level. With a drop-out rate of 10%, it will be necessary to include 183 patients per group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by Institutional Review Board of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Morvan (CPP1089-HPS1). Study was also approved by the French national agency for drug safety (2018061500148). Results will be reported in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03610256.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
e037576.full.pdf (1.37 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Publication funded by an institution

Dates and versions

inserm-03246100 , version 1 (02-06-2021)

Licence

Attribution - CC BY 4.0

Identifiers

Cite

M. Robert, T. Poghosyan, D. Delaunay, E. Pelascini, S. Iceta, et al.. Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol. BMJ Open, 2020, 10 (9), pp.e037576. ⟨10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037576⟩. ⟨inserm-03246100⟩
18 View
27 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More