R. Lhommel, P. Goffette, M. Van-den-eynde, J. F. Pauwels, S. Bilbao et al., Yttrium-90 TOF PET scan demonstrates highresolution biodistribution after liver SIRT, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, vol.36, p.1696, 2009.

R. G. Selwyn, R. J. Nickles, B. R. Thomadsen, L. A. Dewerd, and J. A. Micka, A new internal pair production branching ratio of 90Y: the development of a non-destructive assay for 90Y and 90Sr, Appl Radiat Isot, vol.65, pp.318-345, 2007.

K. Ford, Predicted 0+ level of Zr90, Phys Rev, vol.98, p.1516, 1955.

O. Bagni, D. 'arienzo, M. Chiaramida, P. Chiacchiarelli, L. Cannas et al., 90Y-PET for the assessment of microsphere biodistribution after selective internal radiotherapy, Nucl Med Commun, vol.33, pp.198-204, 2012.

Y. Kao, J. D. Steinberg, Y. Tay, G. Lim, J. Yan et al., Post-radioembolization yttrium-90 PET/CT -part 1: diagnostic reporting, EJNMMI Res, vol.3, p.56, 2013.

R. Lhommel, L. Van-elmbt, P. Goffette, M. Van-den-eynde, J. F. Pauwels et al., Feasibility of 90Y TOF PET-based dosimetry in liver metastasis therapy using SIR-Spheres, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, vol.37, pp.1654-62, 2010.

M. D'arienzo, P. Chiaramida, L. Chiacchiarelli, A. Coniglio, R. Cianni et al., 90Y PET-based dosimetry after selective internal radiotherapy treatments, Nucl Med Commun, vol.33, pp.633-673, 2012.

T. T. Chang, A. C. Bourgeois, A. M. Balius, and A. S. Pasciak, Treatment modification of yttrium-90 radioembolization based on quantitative positron emission tomography/CT imaging, J Vasc Interv Radiol, vol.24, pp.333-340, 2013.

E. Fourkal, I. Veltchev, M. Lin, S. Koren, J. Meyer et al., 3D inpatient dose reconstruction from the PET-CT imaging of 90Y microspheres for metastatic cancer to the liver: feasibility study, Med Phys, vol.40, p.81702, 2013.

Y. Kao, J. D. Steinberg, Y. Tay, G. Lim, J. Yan et al., Post-radioembolization yttrium-90 PET/CT -part 2: doseresponse and tumor predictive dosimetry for resin microspheres, EJNMMI Res, vol.3, p.57, 2013.

S. Ng, V. Lee, M. Law, R. Liu, V. Ma et al., Patient dosimetry based on 90Y PET imaging, J Appl Clin Med Phys, vol.14, pp.212-233, 2013.

T. Carlier, T. Eugène, C. Bodet-milin, E. Garin, C. Ansquer et al., Assessment of acquisition protocols for routine imaging of Y-90 using PET/CT, EJNMMI Res, vol.3, p.11, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00806787

R. Boellaard, Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis, J Nucl Med, vol.50, pp.11-20, 2009.

M. Westerterp, J. Pruim, W. Oyen, O. Hoekstra, A. Paans et al., Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parameters, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, vol.34, pp.392-404, 2007.

R. Boellaard, W. J. Oyen, C. J. Hoekstra, O. S. Hoekstra, E. P. Visser et al., The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, vol.35, pp.2320-2353, 2008.

N. E. Makris, M. C. Huisman, P. E. Kinahan, A. A. Lammertsma, and R. Boellaard, Evaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, vol.40, pp.1507-1522, 2013.

L. Geworski, B. O. Knoop, M. De-wit, V. Ivancevic, R. Bares et al., Multicenter comparison of calibration and cross calibration of PET scanners, J Nucl Med, vol.43, pp.635-644, 2002.

H. H. Park, D. S. Park, D. C. Kweon, S. B. Lee, K. B. Oh et al., Inter-comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT standardized uptake values in Korea, Appl Radiat Isot, vol.69, pp.241-247, 2011.

L. Van-elmbt, S. Vandenberghe, S. Walrand, S. Pauwels, and J. F. , Comparison of yttrium-90 quantitative imaging by TOF and non-TOF PET in a phantom of liver selective internal radiotherapy, Phys Med Biol, vol.56, pp.6759-77, 2011.

K. Willowson, N. Forwood, B. W. Jakoby, A. M. Smith, and D. L. Bailey, Quantitative 90Y image reconstruction in PET, Med Phys, vol.39, pp.7153-7162, 2012.

S. Walrand, R. Lhommel, P. Goffette, M. Van-den-eynde, S. Pauwels et al., Hemaglobin level significantly impacts the tumor cell survival fraction in humans after internal radiotherapy, EJNMMI Res, vol.2, pp.20-28, 2012.

A. Goedicke, Y. Berker, F. A. Verburg, F. F. Behrendt, O. Winz et al., Study-parameter impact in quantitative 90-Yttrium PET imaging for radioembolization treatment monitoring and dosimetry, IEEE Trans Med Imaging, vol.32, pp.485-92, 2013.

J. M. Marti-climent, E. Prieto, C. Elosua, M. Rodrigues-fraile, I. Dominguez-prado et al., PET optimization for improved assessment and accurate quantification of 90Y-microsphere biodistribution after radioembolization, Med Phys, vol.41, p.92503, 2014.

, NEMA NU 2-2007. Rosslyn: National Electrical Manufacturers Association, 2007.

I. Rausch, H. Bergmann, B. Geist, M. Schaffarich, A. Hirtl et al., Variation of system performance, quality control standards and adherence to international FDG-PET/CT imaging guidelines. A national survey of PET/CT operations in Austria, Nuklearmedizin, vol.53, pp.242-250, 2014.

R. Boellaard, M. J. O'doherty, M. A. Weber, F. M. Mottaghy, M. N. Lonsdale et al., FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, vol.37, pp.181-200, 2010.

B. W. Jakoby, Y. Bercier, M. Conti, B. Bendriem, and D. W. Townsend, Physical and clinical performance of the mCT time-of-flight PET/ CT scanner, Phys Med Biol, vol.56, pp.2375-89, 2011.

S. Surti, A. Kuhn, M. E. Werner, A. E. Perkins, J. Kolthammer et al., Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities, J Nucl Med, vol.48, pp.471-80, 2007.

V. Bettinardi, L. Presotto, E. Rapisarda, M. Picchio, L. Gianolli et al., Physical performance of the new hybrid PET/CT Discovery-690, Med Phys, vol.38, pp.5394-411, 2011.

A. Kennedy, P. Mcneillie, W. Dezarn, C. Nutting, B. Sangro et al., Treatment parameters and outcome in 680 treatments of internal radiation with resin 90Y-microspheres for unresectable hepatic tumours, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, vol.74, pp.1494-500, 2009.

J. M. Campbell, C. O. Wong, O. Muzik, B. Marples, M. Joiner et al., Early dose response to yttrium-90 microsphere treatment of metastatic liver cancer by a patient-specific method using single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, vol.74, pp.313-333, 2009.

A. A. Attarwala, F. Molina-duran, K. Busing, S. O. Schoenberg, D. L. Bailey et al., Quantitative and qualitative assessment of Yttrium-90 PET/CT imaging, PLoS One, vol.9, p.110401, 2014.

M. Conti, Effect of randoms on signal-to-noise ratio in TOF PET, IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, vol.53, pp.1188-93, 2006.

M. Elschot, B. Vermolen, M. Lam, B. De-keizer, M. Van-den-bosch et al., Quantitative comparison of PET and Bremsstrahlung SPECT for imaging the in vivo Yttrium-90 microsphere distribution after liver radioembolization, PLoS One, vol.8, p.55742, 2013.

M. Daube-witherspoon, S. Matej, J. Karp, and R. Lewitt, Application of the row action maximum likelihood algorithm with spherical basis functions to clinical PET imaging, IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, vol.48, p.24, 2001.

A. Perkins, Astonish TF: Technical overview of Philips time-offlight PET design and its clinical benefits

, Notes on imaging of Y90 on Siemens PET scanners, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, 2015.