Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Rifampicin and clarithromycin (extended release) versus rifampicin and streptomycin for limited Buruli ulcer lesions: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial

Richard O Phillips 1 Jérôme Robert 2 Kabiru Mohamed Abass 3 William Thompson 3 Fred S. Sarfo 1 Tuah Wilson 4 Godfred Sarpong 1 Thierry Gateau 5 Annick Chauty 5 Raymond Omollo 6 Michael Ochieng Otieno 6 Thaddaeus W Egondi 6 Edwin O Ampadu 7 Didier Agossadou 8 Estelle Marion 9 Line Ganlonon 5 Mark Wansbrough-Jones 10 Jacques Grosset 11 John M Macdonald 12 Terry Treadwell 13 Paul Saunderson 14 Albert Paintsil 15 Linda Lehman 14 Michael Frimpong 1 Nanaa Francisca Sarpong 1 Raoul Saizonou 16 Alexandre Tiendrebeogo 17 Sally-Ann Ohene 18 Ymkje Stienstra 19 Kingsley B Asiedu 20 Tjip S van Der Werf 19 
Abstract : BACKGROUND: Buruli ulcer is a neglected tropical disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans infection that damages the skin and subcutis. It is most prevalent in western and central Africa and Australia. Standard antimicrobial treatment with oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg plus intramuscular streptomycin 15 mg/kg once daily for 8 weeks (RS8) is highly effective, but streptomycin injections are painful and potentially harmful. We aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fully oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg plus clarithromycin 15 mg/kg extended release once daily for 8 weeks (RC8) with that of RS8 for treatment of early Buruli ulcer lesions. METHODS: We did an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised (1:1 with blocks of six), multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial comparing fully oral RC8 with RS8 in patients with early, limited Buruli ulcer lesions. There were four trial sites in hospitals in Ghana (Agogo, Tepa, Nkawie, Dunkwa) and one in Benin (Pobè). Participants were included if they were aged 5 years or older and had typical Buruli ulcer with no more than one lesion (caterories I and II) no larger than 10 cm in diameter. The trial was open label, and neither the investigators who took measurements of the lesions nor the attending doctors were masked to treatment assignment. The primary clinical endpoint was lesion healing (ie, full epithelialisation or stable scar) without recurrence at 52 weeks after start of antimicrobial therapy. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. A sample size of 332 participants was calculated to detect inferiority of RC8 by a margin of 12%. This study was registered with, NCT01659437. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2013, and Dec 31, 2017, participants were recruited to the trial. We stopped recruitment after 310 participants. Median age of participants was 14 years (IQR 10-29) and 153 (52%) were female. 297 patients had PCR-confirmed Buruli ulcer; 151 (51%) were assigned to RS8 treatment, and 146 (49%) received oral RC8 treatment. In the RS8 group, lesions healed in 144 (95%, 95% CI 91 to 98) of 151 patients, whereas lesions healed in 140 (96%, 91 to 99) of 146 patients in the RC8 group. The difference in proportion, -0·5% (-5·2 to 4·2), was not significantly greater than zero (p=0·59), showing that RC8 treatment is non-inferior to RS8 treatment for lesion healing at 52 weeks. Treatment-related adverse events were recorded in 20 (13%) patients receiving RS8 and in nine (7%) patients receiving RC8. Most adverse events were grade 1-2, but one (1%) patient receiving RS8 developed serious ototoxicity and ended treatment after 6 weeks. No patients needed surgical resection. Four patients (two in each study group) had skin grafts. INTERPRETATION: Fully oral RC8 regimen was non-inferior to RS8 for treatment of early, limited Buruli ulcer and was associated with fewer adverse events. Therefore, we propose that fully oral RC8 should be the preferred therapy for early, limited lesions of Buruli ulcer. FUNDING: WHO with additional support from MAP International, American Leprosy Missions, Fondation Raoul Follereau France, Buruli ulcer Groningen Foundation, Sanofi-Pasteur, and BuruliVac.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [41 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Elizabeth Bernardo Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, April 22, 2020 - 9:44:32 AM
Last modification on : Tuesday, May 10, 2022 - 1:54:02 PM


Publication funded by an institution



Richard O Phillips, Jérôme Robert, Kabiru Mohamed Abass, William Thompson, Fred S. Sarfo, et al.. Rifampicin and clarithromycin (extended release) versus rifampicin and streptomycin for limited Buruli ulcer lesions: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial. The Lancet, Elsevier, 2020, 395 (10232), pp.1259-1267. ⟨10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30047-7⟩. ⟨inserm-02550243⟩



Record views


Files downloads