G. A. Donnan, M. Fisher, M. Macleod, and S. M. Davis, Stroke. Lancet, vol.371, pp.1612-1635, 2008.

C. Libersa, F. Berger, S. Courcier-duplantier, and C. Marey, The challenges of the implementation of the European Directive 2001/20/THIS in the hand Member States, Therapie, vol.58, pp.549-51, 2003.

P. Govindarajan, N. W. Dickert, M. Meeker, O. Souza, N. Harney et al., Emergency research: using exception from informed consent, evaluation of community consultations, Acad Emerg Med, vol.20, pp.98-103, 2013.

D. Z. Rose and S. E. Kasner, Informed consent: the rate-limiting step in acute stroke, Front Neurol, vol.2, p.65, 2011.

P. Iwanowski, A. Budaj, A. Czlonkowska, W. Wasek, B. Kozlowska-boszko et al., Informed consent for clinical trials in acute coronary syndromes and stroke following the European Clinical Trials Directive: investigators' esperiences and attitudes, Trials, vol.9, p.45, 2008.

M. C. Brady, A. Frederick, and B. Williams, People with aphasia: capacity to consent, research anticipation and intervention inequalities, Int J Stroke, vol.8, pp.193-199, 2013.

M. Ali, P. M. Bath, P. D. Lyden, J. Bernhardt, and M. Brady, Representation of people with aphasia in randomized controlled trials of acute interventions, Int J Stroke, vol.9, pp.174-82, 2014.

H. Henon, I. Durieu, D. Guerouaou, F. Lebert, F. Pasquier et al., Poststroke dementia: incidence and relationship to prestroke cognitive decline, Neurology, vol.57, pp.1216-1238, 2001.

M. L. Flaherty, J. Karlawish, J. C. Khoury, D. Kleindorfer, D. Woo et al., How significant is surrogate consent for stroke research?, Neurology, vol.71, pp.1566-71, 2008.

S. E. Kasner, A. Delgiudice, S. Rosenberg, M. Sheen, J. M. Luciano et al., Who will participate in acute stroke trials?, Neurology, vol.72, pp.1682-1690, 2009.

G. Demarquay, L. Derex, N. Nighoghossian, P. Adeleine, F. Philippeau et al., Ethical issues of informed consent in acute stroke. Analysis of the modalities of consent in 56 patients enrolled in urgent therapeutic trials, Cerebrovasc Dis, vol.19, pp.65-73, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00427736

K. A. Dani, M. T. Mccornick, and K. W. Muir, Brain lesion volume and capacity for consent in stroke trials: Potential regulatory barriers to the use of surrogate markers, Stroke, vol.39, pp.2336-2376, 2008.

I. Kane, R. Lindley, S. Lewis, and P. Sandercock, Impact of stroke syndrome and stroke severity on the process of the consent in the Third International Stroke Trial, Cerebrovasc Dis, vol.21, pp.348-52, 2006.

A. Jr, H. P. Bendixen, and B. H. , Kappelle LJ, the TOAST investigators. Classification of subtypes of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in multicenter clinical trial, Stroke, vol.24, pp.35-41, 1993.

D. Deplanque, I. Masse, C. Lefebvre, C. Libersa, D. Leys et al., Prior TIA, lipid-lowering drug use and physical activity decrease ischemic stroke severity, Neurology, vol.67, pp.1403-1413, 2006.

J. Stein, B. Wagner, and L. C. , Is informed consent a "Yes or No" response? Enhancing the shared decision-making process for persons with aphasia, Top Stroke Rehabil, vol.13, pp.42-48, 2006.

X. Ducrocq, L. Taillandier, R. Anxionnat, J. C. Lacour, M. Debouverie et al., Ethical approach to informed consent for participation in clinical studies in acute cerebral infarct, Presse Med, vol.29, pp.1335-1375, 2000.

D. Kleindorf, C. J. Linsell, K. Alwell, D. Woo, M. L. Flaherty et al., Ischemic stroke survivor's opinion regarding research utilizing exception from informed consent, Cerebrovasc Dis, vol.32, pp.321-327, 2011.

J. N. Goldstein, J. A. Espinola, J. Fisher, D. J. Pallin, C. Jr et al., Public opinion of stroke clinical trial using exception from informed consent, Int J Emerg Med, vol.3, pp.385-394, 2010.

D. T. Chen, D. L. Case, T. G. Brott, R. D. Brown, S. L. Silliman et al., Impact of restrincting enrollment in stroke genetics research to adults able to provide informed consent. Stro ke, vol.39, pp.831-838, 2008.

J. R. Rosenbaum, D. M. Bravata, J. Concato, L. M. Brass, N. Kim et al., Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of: ? Convenient online submission ? Thorough peer review ? No space constraints or color figure charges ? Immediate publication on acceptance ? Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar ? Research which is freely available for redistribution, Stroke, vol.36, pp.528-537, 2005.