Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism, JAMA, vol.263, issue.10, pp.1321-1323, 1990. ,
Effects of editorial peer review, JAMA, vol.287, issue.21, pp.2784-2790, 2002. ,
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals, J R Soc Med, vol.99, pp.178-82, 2006. ,
Who reviews the reviewers? Feasibility of using a fictitious manuscript to evaluate peer reviewer performance, Ann Emerg Med, vol.32, issue.3, pp.310-317, 1998. ,
Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal : are they reliable and do editors care?, PLoS One, vol.5, issue.4, pp.2-6, 2010. ,
Re-reviewing peer review, Sci Signal, vol.2, issue.85, pp.1-3, 2009. ,
Peer review for biomedical publications : we can improve the system, BMC Med, vol.12, issue.179, pp.1-4, 2014. ,
Make peer review scientific, Nature, vol.535, pp.31-34, 2016. ,
Custodians of high-quality science: are editors and peer reviewers good enough?, 2017. ,
Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals, Trials, vol.13, p.77, 2012. ,
Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results, JAMA, vol.303, issue.20, pp.2058-64, 2010. ,
Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study, BMJ, vol.349, p.4145, 2014. ,
Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention, BMC Med Res Methodol, vol.15, p.85, 2015. ,
Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.2, p.16, 2007. ,
Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Med, vol.14, p.85, 2016. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-01332189
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses : the PRISMA statement, PLoS Med, vol.6, issue.7, p.1000097, 2009. ,
International prospective register of systematic reviews, 2017. ,
Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography, Intern J Epidemiol, vol.36, pp.666-76, 2007. ,
R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 2017. ,
Reviewing the research methods literature: principles and strategies illustrated by a systematic overview of sampling in qualitative research, Syst Rev, vol.5, p.172, 2016. ,
The discovery of grounded theory, 1967. ,
Manuscript peer review at the AJR: facts, figures, and quality assessment, Am J Roentgenol, vol.164, issue.4, pp.1007-1016, 1995. ,
What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?, JAMA, vol.280, issue.3, pp.231-234, 1998. ,
Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research, Nurs Outlook, vol.57, issue.1, pp.18-26, 2009. ,
Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts, JAMA, vol.280, issue.3, pp.229-260, 1998. ,
Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews: two randomized trials, JAMA, vol.287, issue.21, pp.2781-2784, 2002. ,
Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers ' recommendations : a randomised trial, BMJ, vol.318, issue.7175, pp.23-30, 1999. ,
The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review, JAMA, vol.263, issue.10, pp.1371-1377, 1990. ,
Supporting and enhancing peer review in the BJGP, Br J Gen Pract, vol.64, issue.624, pp.459-61, 2014. ,
Reviewer status and review quality, N Engl J Med, vol.312, issue.10, pp.658-667, 1985. ,
The JBJS peer-review scoring scale: a valid, reliable instrument for measuring the quality of peer review reports, Learn Publ, vol.29, pp.23-28, 2016. ,
Improving the quality of manuscript reviews : impact of introducing a structured electronic template to submit reviews, AJR, vol.200, pp.20-23, 2013. ,
Authors' and editors' perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals, J Nurs Scholarsh, vol.42, issue.1, pp.58-65, 2010. ,
Characteristics of reviewers and quality of reviews: a retrospective study of reviewers at Pakistan journal of medical sciences, Pakistan J Med Sci, vol.22, issue.2, pp.101-107, 2006. ,
Does masking author identity improve peer review quality ? A randomized controlled trial, JAMA, vol.280, issue.3, pp.240-243, 1998. ,
Scientific and statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to nursing research: comparison of completeness, quality, and usefulness, Nurs Outlook, vol.58, issue.4, pp.188-99, 2010. ,
Peerage of science: will it work?, Trends Ecol Evol, vol.27, issue.4, pp.189-90, 2012. ,
, , 2017.
Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts, J Clin Epidemiol, vol.52, issue.7, pp.625-634, 1999. ,
The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews, J Gen Intern Med, vol.8, issue.8, pp.422-430, 1993. ,
Evaluating peer reviews: pilot testing of a grading instrument, JAMA, vol.272, issue.2, pp.98-100, 1994. ,
Quality assessment of reviewers' reports using a simple instrument, Obstet Gynecol, vol.108, issue.4, pp.979-85, 2006. ,
On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions, Biostatistics, vol.2, issue.4, pp.463-71, 2001. ,
The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis, JAMA, vol.282, issue.11, pp.1054-60, 1999. ,
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials, BMJ, vol.343, p.5928, 2011. ,
Perspectives on involvement in the peer-review process: surveys of patient and public reviewers at two journals, BMJ Open, vol.8, p.23357, 2018. ,
Bubble effect: including internet search engines in systematic reviews introduces selection bias and impedes scientific reproducibility, BMC Med Res Methodol, vol.18, issue.1, p.130, 2018. ,
How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set, Lancet, vol.383, issue.9912, pp.156-65, 2014. ,
Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American journal of roentgenology, AJR, vol.184, issue.6, pp.1731-1736, 2005. ,
Improving your reviewer score: it's not that difficult, AJR, vol.209, pp.711-713, 2017. ,
Longitudinal trends in the performance of scientific peer reviewers, Ann Emerg Med, vol.57, issue.2, pp.141-149, 2011. ,
Effects of training reviewers on quality of peer review: a before-andafter study (Abstract, 2017. ,
, Review quality collector, 2017.
Does exchanging comments of Indian and non-Indian reviewers improve the quality of manuscript reviews?, Natl Med J India, vol.12, issue.5, pp.210-213, 1999. ,
Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers, Ann Emerg Med, vol.40, issue.3, pp.323-331, 2002. ,