T. Jefferson, M. Rudin, S. B. Folse, and F. Davidoff, Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, issue.1, 2006.

R. Bruce, A. Chauvin, L. Trinquart, P. Ravaud, and I. Boutron, Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Med, vol.14, issue.1, p.85, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-01332189

J. P. Kassirer and E. W. Campion, Peer review: crude and understudied, but indispensable, JAMA, vol.272, issue.2, pp.96-103, 1994.

D. Moher, P. Glasziou, I. Chalmers, M. Nasser, P. M. Bossuyt et al., Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening?, Lancet, vol.387, pp.1573-86, 2016.

D. Moher and D. G. Altman, Four proposals to help improve the medical research literature, PLoS Med, vol.12, issue.9, p.1001864, 2015.

A. Chauvin, P. Ravaud, G. Baron, C. Barnes, and I. Boutron, The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors, BMC Med, vol.13, issue.1, p.1, 2015.

, Reviewer roles and responsibilities -Council of Science Editors

J. Galipeau, V. Barbour, P. Baskin, S. Bell-syer, K. Cobey et al., A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals, BMC Med, vol.14, p.16, 2016.

D. Moher, J. Galipeau, S. Alam, V. Barbour, K. Bartolomeos et al., Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement, BMC Med, vol.15, issue.1, p.167, 2017.

H. Arksey, O. Malley, and L. , Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework, Int J Soc Res Methodol, vol.8, issue.1, pp.19-32, 2005.

D. Levac, H. Colquhoun, O. 'brien, and K. K. , Scoping studies: advancing the methodology, Implement Sci IS, vol.5, p.69, 2010.

J. Briggs-institute, The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015, Methodol JBI Scoping Rev Joanna Briggs Inst JBI, 2015.

K. Glonti and D. Hren, Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study, BMJ Open, vol.8, issue.10, p.20568, 2018.

K. Glonti, D. Cauchi, E. Cobo, I. Boutron, D. Moher et al., A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals, BMJ Open, vol.7, issue.10, p.17468, 2017.

A. C. Tricco, L. E. Zarin, W. O'brien, K. K. Colquhoun, H. Levac et al., PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation, Ann Intern Med, 2018.

J. Mcgowan, M. Sampson, D. M. Salzwedel, E. Cogo, V. Foerster et al., PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement, J Clin Epidemiol, vol.75, pp.40-46, 2016.

D. Rennie, E. Knoll, and A. Flangrin, The international congress on peer review in biomedical publication, JAMA [Internet], vol.261, 1989.

D. Rennie, A. Flanagin, F. Godlee, and T. Bloom, The eighth international congress on peer review and biomedical publication: a call for research, JAMA, vol.313, issue.20, pp.2031-2033, 2015.

D. G. Altman, Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors, BMJ, vol.330, issue.7499, pp.1056-1063, 2005.

A. M. Vintzileos, C. V. Ananth, A. O. Odibo, S. P. Chauhan, J. C. Smulian et al., The relationship between a reviewer's recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.211, issue.6, pp.703-704, 2014.

C. J. Lee, C. R. Sugimoto, G. Zhang, and B. Cronin, Bias in peer review, J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, vol.64, issue.1, pp.2-17, 2013.

K. Dickersin, E. Ssemanda, C. Mansell, and D. Rennie, What do the JAMA editors say when they discuss manuscripts that they are considering for publication? Developing a schema for classifying the content of editorial discussion, BMC Med Res Methodol, vol.7, p.44, 2007.

P. Cintas, Peer review: from recognition to improved practices, FEMS Microbiol Lett, vol.363, issue.12, p.115, 2016.

C. H. Davis, B. L. Bass, K. E. Behrns, K. D. Lillemoe, O. J. Garden et al., Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals, Res Integr Peer Rev, vol.3, issue.1, p.4, 2018.

M. Kovanis, R. Porcher, P. Ravaud, and L. Trinquart, The global burden of journal peer review in the biomedical literature: strong imbalance in the collective enterprise, PLoS One, vol.11, issue.11, p.166387, 2016.

J. Galipeau, K. D. Cobey, V. Barbour, P. Baskin, S. Bell-syer et al., An international survey and modified Delphi process revealed editors' perceptions, training needs, and ratings of competency-related statements for the development of core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals, vol.6, 1000.

L. Tite and S. Schroter, Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey, J Epidemiol Community Health, vol.61, issue.1, pp.9-12, 2007.

T. Ross-hellauer, Bar-on ME, Konopasek L. Snippets: an innovative method for efficient, effective faculty development, What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research [Internet, vol.6, pp.207-217, 2014.

, Publisher's Note

, Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations