Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, issue.1, 2006. ,
Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Med, vol.14, issue.1, p.85, 2016. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-01332189
Peer review: crude and understudied, but indispensable, JAMA, vol.272, issue.2, pp.96-103, 1994. ,
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening?, Lancet, vol.387, pp.1573-86, 2016. ,
Four proposals to help improve the medical research literature, PLoS Med, vol.12, issue.9, p.1001864, 2015. ,
The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors, BMC Med, vol.13, issue.1, p.1, 2015. ,
, Reviewer roles and responsibilities -Council of Science Editors
A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals, BMC Med, vol.14, p.16, 2016. ,
Core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals: consensus statement, BMC Med, vol.15, issue.1, p.167, 2017. ,
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework, Int J Soc Res Methodol, vol.8, issue.1, pp.19-32, 2005. ,
Scoping studies: advancing the methodology, Implement Sci IS, vol.5, p.69, 2010. ,
The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015, Methodol JBI Scoping Rev Joanna Briggs Inst JBI, 2015. ,
Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study, BMJ Open, vol.8, issue.10, p.20568, 2018. ,
A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals, BMJ Open, vol.7, issue.10, p.17468, 2017. ,
PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation, Ann Intern Med, 2018. ,
PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement, J Clin Epidemiol, vol.75, pp.40-46, 2016. ,
The international congress on peer review in biomedical publication, JAMA [Internet], vol.261, 1989. ,
The eighth international congress on peer review and biomedical publication: a call for research, JAMA, vol.313, issue.20, pp.2031-2033, 2015. ,
Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors, BMJ, vol.330, issue.7499, pp.1056-1063, 2005. ,
The relationship between a reviewer's recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.211, issue.6, pp.703-704, 2014. ,
Bias in peer review, J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, vol.64, issue.1, pp.2-17, 2013. ,
What do the JAMA editors say when they discuss manuscripts that they are considering for publication? Developing a schema for classifying the content of editorial discussion, BMC Med Res Methodol, vol.7, p.44, 2007. ,
Peer review: from recognition to improved practices, FEMS Microbiol Lett, vol.363, issue.12, p.115, 2016. ,
Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals, Res Integr Peer Rev, vol.3, issue.1, p.4, 2018. ,
The global burden of journal peer review in the biomedical literature: strong imbalance in the collective enterprise, PLoS One, vol.11, issue.11, p.166387, 2016. ,
An international survey and modified Delphi process revealed editors' perceptions, training needs, and ratings of competency-related statements for the development of core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals, vol.6, 1000. ,
Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey, J Epidemiol Community Health, vol.61, issue.1, pp.9-12, 2007. ,
Bar-on ME, Konopasek L. Snippets: an innovative method for efficient, effective faculty development, What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research [Internet, vol.6, pp.207-217, 2014. ,
, Publisher's Note
, Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations