J. Aguilar, I. Rubio, E. Muñoz, A. Pellicer, and M. Meseguer, Study of nucleation status in the second cell cycle of human embryo and its impact on implantation rate, Fertil. Steril, vol.106, pp.291-299, 2016.

S. Alfarawati, E. Fragouli, P. Colls, and D. Wells, First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis, Hum. Reprod, vol.26, pp.1560-1574, 2011.

A. Barrie, R. Homburg, G. Mcdowell, J. Brown, C. Kingsland et al., Examining the efficacy of six published time-lapse imaging embryo selection algorithms to predict implantation to demonstrate the need for the development of specific, in-house morphokinetic selection algorithms, Fertil. Steril, vol.107, pp.613-621, 2017.

N. Basile, M. Nogales, C. Del, F. Bronet, M. Florensa et al., Increasing the probability of selecting chromosomally normal embryos by time-lapse morphokinetics analysis, Fertil. Steril, vol.101, pp.699-704, 2014.

A. Campbell, S. Fishel, N. Bowman, S. Duffy, M. Sedler et al., Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics, Reprod. Biomed. Online, vol.26, pp.477-485, 2013.

A. Campbell, S. Fishel, N. Bowman, S. Duffy, M. Sedler et al., Retrospective analysis of outcomes after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGS, Reprod. Biomed. Online, vol.27, pp.140-146, 2013.

A. Capalbo, V. Romanelli, D. Cimadomo, L. Girardi, M. Stoppa et al., Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management, J. Assist. Reprod. Genet, vol.33, pp.1279-1286, 2016.

A. Capalbo, L. Rienzi, and F. Ubaldi, New approaches for multifactor preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic diseases and aneuploidies from a single biopsy, Fertil. Steril, vol.105, pp.297-298, 2016.

M. Chawla, M. Fakih, A. Shunnar, A. Bayram, A. Hellani et al., Morphokinetic analysis of cleavage stage embryos and its relationship to aneuploidy in a retrospective time-lapse imaging study, J. Assist. Reprod. Genet, vol.32, pp.69-75, 2015.

H. N. Ciray, A. Campbell, I. E. Agerholm, J. Aguilar, S. Chamayou et al., Time-Lapse User Group. Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group, Hum. Reprod, vol.29, pp.2650-2660, 2014.

E. M. Dahdouh, J. Balayla, and J. A. García-velasco, Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis
DOI : 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.038

, Fertil. Steril, vol.104, pp.1503-1512, 2015.

M. Del-carmen-nogales, F. Bronet, N. Basile, E. M. Martínez, A. Liñán et al., Type of chromosome abnormality affects embryo morphology dynamics, Fertil. Steril, vol.107, pp.229-235, 2017.

L. Desch, C. Bruno, M. Luu, J. Barberet, C. Choux et al., Embryo multinucleation at the two-cell stage is an independent predictor of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes, Fertil. Steril, vol.107, pp.97-103, 2017.

D. Feil, R. C. Henshaw, and M. Lane, Day 4 embryo selection is equal to Day 5 using a new embryo scoring system validated in single embryo transfers, Hum Reprod, vol.23, pp.1505-1510, 2008.

F. Fiorentino, L. Spizzichino, S. Bono, A. Biricik, G. Kokkali et al., PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization, Hum. Reprod, vol.26, pp.1925-1935, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/humrep/der082
URL : https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-pdf/26/7/1925/17054666/der082.pdf

T. Fréour, N. Le-fleuter, J. Lammers, C. Splingart, A. Reignier et al., External validation of a time-lapse prediction model, Fertil. Steril, vol.103, pp.917-922, 2015.

G. L. Harton, J. C. Harper, E. Coonen, T. Pehlivan, K. Vesela et al., European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) PGD Consortium. ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for fluorescence in situ hybridization-based PGD, Hum. Reprod, vol.26, pp.25-32, 2011.

C. Lagalla, N. Tarozzi, R. Sciajno, D. Wells, M. Di-santo et al., Embryos with morphokinetic abnormalities may develop into euploid blastocysts, Reprod. Biomed. Online, vol.34, pp.137-146, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.11.008
URL : http://www.rbmojournal.com/article/S1472648316306137/pdf

Y. Liu, V. Chapple, K. Feenan, P. Roberts, and P. Matson, Clinical significance of intercellular contact at the four-cell stage of human embryos, and the use of abnormal cleavage patterns to identify embryos with low implantation potential: a time-lapse study, Fertil. Steril, vol.103, pp.1485-1491, 2015.

M. G. Minasi, A. Colasante, T. Riccio, A. Ruberti, V. Casciani et al., Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study, Hum. Reprod, vol.31, pp.2245-2254, 2016.

S. Mumusoglu, I. Yarali, G. Bozdag, P. Ozdemir, M. Polat et al., Time-lapse morphokinetic assessment has low to moderate ability to predict euploidy when patient-and ovarian stimulation-related factors are taken into account with the use of clustered data analysis, Fertil. Steril, vol.107, pp.413-421, 2017.

A. Reignier, J. Lammers, P. Barriere, and T. Freour, Can time-lapse parameters predict embryo ploidy? A systematic review, Reprod Biomed Online, vol.36, pp.380-387, 2018.
DOI : 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.01.001
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01881117

L. Rienzi, A. Capalbo, M. Stoppa, S. Romano, R. Maggiulli et al., No evidence of association between blastocyst aneuploidy and morphokinetic assessment in a selected population of poor-prognosis patients: a longitudinal cohort study, Reprod. Biomed. Online, vol.30, pp.57-66, 2015.

I. Rubio, R. Kuhlmann, I. Agerholm, J. Kirk, J. Herrero et al., Limited implantation success of directcleaved human zygotes: a time-lapse study, Fertil. Steril, vol.98, pp.1458-1463, 2012.

R. T. Scott, K. M. Upham, E. J. Forman, T. Zhao, and N. R. Treff, Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial, Fertil Steril, vol.100, pp.624-630, 2013.

K. J. Tobler, P. R. Brezina, A. T. Benner, L. Du, X. Xu et al., Two different microarray technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening, due to reciprocal translocation imbalances, demonstrate equivalent euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates, J. Assist. Reprod. Genet, vol.31, pp.843-850, 2014.

L. Wilton, A. Thornhill, J. Traeger-synodinos, K. D. Sermon, and J. C. Harper, The causes of misdiagnosis and adverse outcomes in PGD, Hum. Reprod, vol.24, pp.1221-1228, 2009.

F. Zacchini, R. Arena, A. Abramik, and G. E. Ptak, Embryo biopsy and development: the known and the unknown, Reproduction, vol.154, pp.143-148, 2017.
DOI : 10.1530/rep-17-0431
URL : https://rep.bioscientifica.com/downloadpdf/journals/rep/154/5/REP-17-0431.pdf

Q. Zhan, Z. Ye, R. Clarke, Z. Rosenwaks, and N. Zaninovic, Direct Unequal Cleavages: Embryo Developmental Competence, Genetic Constitution and Clinical Outcome, PloS One, vol.11, p.166398, 2016.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0166398
URL : https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166398&type=printable