Correction to: Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer

Benjamin Houdu 1 Charline Lasnon 1, 2 Idlir Licaj 3 Guy Thomas 4 Pascal Do 5 Anne-Valérie Guizard 6 Cédric Desmonts 1 Nicolas Aide 1, 2, *
* Corresponding author
1 Service de médecine nucléaire [CHU Caen]
2 ANTICIPE - Unité de recherche interdisciplinaire pour la prévention et le traitement des cancers
3 CRC - Centre de recherche clinique [CHU Caen]
4 Service d'Informatique médicale [Caen]
5 Service de Cancérologie pulmonaire [Caen]
6 Registre général des tumeurs du Calvados [Caen]
Abstract : An error occurred in the labelling of Fig. 3, where math symbols for SUV thresholds were inverted in panel b when the EARL threshold was applied to the PSF dataset and vice versa. This figure should read as follows: Fig. 3: Prognostic value of tumour SUVmax.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas
https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-02128506
Contributor : Myriam Bodescot <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, May 14, 2019 - 12:28:53 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, December 4, 2019 - 9:52:03 AM

Links full text

openaccess

Identifiers

Collections

COMUE-NORMANDIE | U1086 | UNICAEN

Citation

Benjamin Houdu, Charline Lasnon, Idlir Licaj, Guy Thomas, Pascal Do, et al.. Correction to: Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Springer Verlag (Germany), 2019, 46 (2), pp.533-534. ⟨10.1007/s00259-018-4216-8⟩. ⟨inserm-02128506⟩

Export

BibTeX TEI DC DCterms EndNote

Share

Metrics

Record views

53

Contact

Informations

CCSD