Correction to: Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer

Abstract : An error occurred in the labelling of Fig. 3, where math symbols for SUV thresholds were inverted in panel b when the EARL threshold was applied to the PSF dataset and vice versa. This figure should read as follows: Fig. 3: Prognostic value of tumour SUVmax.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-02128506
Contributor : Myriam Bodescot <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, May 14, 2019 - 12:28:53 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, December 4, 2019 - 9:52:03 AM

Links full text

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Benjamin Houdu, Charline Lasnon, Idlir Licaj, Guy Thomas, Pascal Do, et al.. Correction to: Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Springer Verlag (Germany), 2019, 46 (2), pp.533-534. ⟨10.1007/s00259-018-4216-8⟩. ⟨inserm-02128506⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

53