Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the english language literature, 1860-1980, Obstet Gynecol Surv, vol.38, pp.322-360, 1983. ,
Conduct of normal labor and delivery, Williams obstetrics, pp.371-93, 1993. ,
Episiotomy for vaginal birth, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.1, p.81, 2009. ,
Trends in perinatal health in France between 1995 and 2010: results from the national perinatal surveys, J Gynecol ObstetBiol Reprod, vol.41, pp.151-66, 2012. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00857949
Episiotomy rates in primiparous women in Latin America: hospital based descriptive study, BMJ, vol.324, issue.7343, pp.945-951, 2002. ,
Episiotomy rates around the world: an update, Birth, vol.32, issue.3, pp.219-242, 2005. ,
, Routine vs selective episiotomy: a randomised controlled trial, Lancet, vol.342, pp.1517-1525, 1993.
Episiotomy and perineal tears presumed to be imminent: randomized controlled trial, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol.83, pp.364-372, 2004. ,
Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.2, p.81, 2017. ,
, American College of Obstetricians-Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin. Episiotomy. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists, Obstet Gynecol, vol.71, issue.4, pp.957-62, 2006.
Evidence-based labor and delivery management, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.199, pp.445-54, 2008. ,
The clinical practice obstetrics committee. Guidelines for operative vaginal birth, J Obstet Gynaecol Can, vol.26, issue.8, pp.747-53, 2004. ,
, National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth, 2017.
Episiotomy and perineal lesions in spontaneous vaginal deliveries, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, issue.12, pp.950-954, 1992. ,
, World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. Care in normal birth: a practical guide, 1996.
The practice of episiotomy in France 10 years after the recommendations of CNGOF: what inventory?, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, vol.44, pp.232-240, 2016. ,
, Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français. Text of the guidelines for episiotomy, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.35, issue.1, pp.7-135, 2006.
Evaluation of the metrological quality of medico-administrative data for perinatal indicators: a pilot study, J Community Med Health Educ, vol.6, issue.3, pp.1-6, 2016. ,
Quality of perinatal statistics from hospital discharge data: comparison with civil registration and the 2010 National Perinatal Survey, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.43, issue.9, pp.680-90, 2014. ,
Can the rate of episiotomy still be lowered? Status update in PACA region (south of France), Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol, vol.45, issue.3, pp.146-51, 2017. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01573820
A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery, BJOG, vol.115, pp.1688-94, 2008. ,
Episiotomy in France in 2010: Variations according to obstetrical context and place of birth, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), issue.45, pp.691-700, 2016. ,
Episiotomy and its relationship to various clinical variables that influence its performance, Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem, vol.24, p.2793, 2016. ,
How singleton breech babies at term are born in France: a survey of data from the AUDIPOG network, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.188, pp.79-82, 2015. ,
Cossa s, et al. operative delivery data in France for 2007: results of a national survey within teaching hospitals, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.39, pp.121-153, 2010. ,
From the impact of French guidelines to reduce episiotomy's rate, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.41, pp.62-70, 2012. ,
Assessment of restrictive episiotomy use and impact on perineal tears in the Burgundy's perinatal network, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.45, pp.1165-71, 2016. ,
Variations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: a study based on routine national data in Euro-Peristat project, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol.95, issue.7, pp.746-54, 2016. ,
Decreased anal sphincter lacerations associated with restrictive episiotomy use, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.192, issue.5, p.1620, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.017
Immediate and long term complications of episiotomy, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.35, issue.1, pp.1-59, 2006. ,
Is it possible to never perform episiotomy during vaginal delivery?, Obstet Gynecol, vol.123, issue.1, p.38, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.aog.0000447314.51968.54
Episiotomy: the final cut?, Arch Gynecol Obstet, vol.286, issue.6, pp.1369-73, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00404-012-2460-x
Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): prevention, recognition, and repair, J Obstet Gynaecol Can, vol.37, issue.12, pp.1131-1179, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30081-0
Can we reduce the episotomy rate?, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.35, issue.1, pp.68-76, 2006. ,
Methods and consequences in use of episiotomy, BMJ, vol.309, pp.1255-1263, 1994. ,
An initiative to reduce the episiotomy rate: Association of Feedback and the Hawthorne effect with leapfrog goals, Obstet Gynecol, vol.30, issue.1, pp.146-50, 2017. ,
A behavioral intervention to improve obstetrical care, N Engl J Med, vol.358, issue.18, pp.1929-1969, 2008. ,