R. Smith, Peer review: reform or revolution?, BMJ, vol.315, issue.7111, pp.759-60, 1997.

D. Rennie, Editorial peer review: let us put it on trial, Control Clin Trials, vol.13, issue.6, pp.443-448, 1992.

D. A. Kronick, Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism, JAMA, vol.263, issue.10, pp.1321-1323, 1990.

T. Jefferson, M. Rudin, B. Folse, S. Davidoff, and F. , Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.2, p.16, 2007.

A. Chauvin, P. Ravaud, G. Baron, C. Barnes, and I. Boutron, The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors, BMC Med, vol.13, p.158, 2015.

M. J. Mahoney, Publication prejudices: an experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system, Cogn Ther Res, vol.1, issue.2, pp.161-75, 1977.

, The Editors of The L. Retraction-Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, nonspecific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children, Lancet, vol.375, issue.9713, p.445, 2010.

R. C. Ho, K. K. Mak, R. Tao, Y. Lu, J. R. Day et al., Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities, BMC Med Res Methodol, vol.13, p.74, 2013.

E. Wager and T. Jefferson, Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals, Learned Publishing, vol.14, issue.4, pp.257-63, 2001.

D. Rennie, Misconduct and journal peer review, 1999.

M. Henderson, Problems with peer review, BMJ, vol.340, p.1409, 2010.

S. Hopewell, G. S. Collins, I. Boutron, L. M. Yu, J. Cook et al., Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study, BMJ, vol.349, p.4145, 2014.

C. Lazarus, R. Haneef, P. Ravaud, and I. Boutron, Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention, BMC Med Res Methodol, vol.15, p.85, 2015.

J. Galipeau, D. Moher, B. Skidmore, C. Campbell, P. Hendry et al., Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol), Syst Rev, vol.2, p.41, 2013.

R. Bruce, A. Chauvin, L. Trinquart, P. Ravaud, and I. Boutron, Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Med, vol.14, issue.1, p.85, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-01332189

R. Hughes and M. Huby, The application of vignettes in social and nursing research, J Adv Nurs, vol.37, issue.4, pp.382-388, 2002.

L. M. Bachmann, A. Mühleisen, A. Bock, G. Ter-riet, U. Held et al., Vignette studies of medical choice and judgement to study caregivers' medical decision behaviour: systematic review, BMC Med Res Methodol, vol.8, issue.1, p.50, 2008.

G. Do-pham, L. Cleach, L. Giraudeau, B. Maruani, A. Chosidow et al., Designing randomized-controlled trials to improve head-louse treatment: systematic review using a vignette-based method, J Invest Dermatol, vol.134, issue.3, pp.628-662, 2014.

D. Gould, Using vignettes to collect data for nursing research studies: how valid are the findings?, J Clin Nurs, vol.5, issue.4, pp.207-219, 1996.

G. B. Emerson, W. J. Warme, F. M. Wolf, J. D. Heckman, R. A. Brand et al., Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review: a randomized controlled trial, Arch Intern Med, vol.170, issue.21, pp.1934-1943, 2010.

M. Kovanis, L. Trinquart, P. Ravaud, and R. Porcher, Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication, Scientometrics, vol.113, issue.1, pp.651-671, 2017.