Detecting and Interpreting Heterogeneity and Publication Bias in Image-Based Meta-Analyses

Thomas Maullin-Sapey 1 Camille Maumet 2 Thomas E. Nichols 1
2 VisAGeS - Vision, Action et Gestion d'informations en Santé
INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale : U1228, Inria Rennes – Bretagne Atlantique , IRISA_D5 - SIGNAUX ET IMAGES NUMÉRIQUES, ROBOTIQUE
Abstract : With the increase of data sharing, meta-analyses are becoming increasingly important in the neuroimaging community. They provide a quantitative summary of published results and heightened confidence due to higher statistical power. The gold standard approach to combine results from neuroimaging studies is an Image-Based Meta-Analysis (IBMA) [1] in which group-level maps from different studies are combined. Recently, we have introduced the IBMA toolbox, an extension for SPM that provides methods for combining image maps from multiple studies [2]. However, the current toolbox lacks diagnostic tools used to assess critical assumptions of meta-analysis, in particular whether there is inter-study variation requiring random-effects IBMA, and whether publication bias is present. Here, we present two new tools added to the IBMA toolbox to detect heterogeneity and to assess evidence of publication bias.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadatas
Contributor : Camille Maumet <>
Submitted on : Thursday, November 29, 2018 - 5:22:23 PM
Last modification on : Monday, March 4, 2019 - 2:07:42 PM


Files produced by the author(s)


  • HAL Id : inserm-01933023, version 1


Thomas Maullin-Sapey, Camille Maumet, Thomas E. Nichols. Detecting and Interpreting Heterogeneity and Publication Bias in Image-Based Meta-Analyses. OHBM 2018 - 24th Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping, Jun 2018, Singapore, Singapore. ⟨inserm-01933023⟩



Record views


Files downloads