Implant and Prosthodontic Survival Rates with Implant Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses in the Edentulous Mandible after at Least 5 Years: A Systematic Review, Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol.20, issue.Suppl, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01741.x
Survival and success of ITI implants and prostheses: retrospective study of cases with 5-year followup, Eur J Dent, vol.3, pp.42-51, 2009. ,
Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration, Dent Mater Off Publ Acad Dent Mater, vol.23, pp.844-54, 2007. ,
Surface modifications of dental implants, Australian Dental Journal, vol.84, issue.s1, pp.26-33, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1002/mabi.200600270
URL : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00038.x/pdf
Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review, Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol.74, pp.185-206, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jbm.a.10363
URL : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01777.x/pdf
Enhanced Bone Apposition to a Chemically Modified SLA Titanium Surface, Journal of Dental Research, vol.83, issue.7, pp.529-562, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060103.x
) and conventional SLA titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol.6, issue.1, pp.78-86, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jbm.a.30320
Effect of micro-roughness produced by TiO2 blasting???tensile testing of bone attachment by using coin-shaped implants, Biomaterials, vol.23, issue.21, pp.4211-4220, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00167-9
A study on the effect of dual blasting with TiO2 on titanium implant surfaces on functional attachment in bone, J Biomed Mater Res A, vol.67, pp.524-554, 2003. ,
Effect of modifications of dual acid-etched implant surfaces on peri-implant bone formation. Part I: organic coatings, Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol.69, issue.1, pp.31-38, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jbm.a.30778
Influence of implant surfaces on osseointegration, Braz Dent J, vol.21, pp.471-81, 2010. ,
Anodizing color coded anodized Ti6Al4V medical devices for increasing bone cell functions, Int J Nanomed, vol.8, pp.109-126, 2013. ,
Surface microtopography regulates osteointegration: the role of implant surface microtopography in osteointegration, Alpha Omegan, vol.98, pp.9-19, 2005. ,
Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review, Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol.16, pp.172-84, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-011-7772-6
URL : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x/pdf
Adhesion and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on titanium nanopores, European Cells and Materials, vol.22, pp.84-96, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.22203/eCM.v022a07
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00849362
Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.24, issue.4, pp.2130-2135, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0368
URL : http://www.pnas.org/content/106/7/2130.full.pdf
Significantly accelerated osteoblast cell growth on aligned TiO2 nanotubes, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol.13, issue.1, pp.97-103, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jbm.a.30722
Greater osteoblast functions on multiwalled carbon nanotubes grown from anodized nanotubular titanium for orthopedic applications, Nanotechnology, vol.18, issue.36, p.365102, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0957-4484/18/36/365102
Enhanced osteoblast functions on anodized titanium with nanotube-like structures, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol.26, issue.1, pp.157-66, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1007/b112196
Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells, Biomaterials, vol.28, issue.21, pp.3188-97, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.020
Topographically induced direct cell mechanotransduction, Medical Engineering & Physics, vol.27, issue.9, pp.730-772, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.04.005
Nanotube Diameter Directs Cell Fate, Nano Letters, vol.7, issue.6, pp.1686-91, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1021/nl070678d
Modulation of cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on materials designed for body implants, Biotechnology Advances, vol.29, issue.6, pp.739-67, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.06.004
Cell differentiation and osseointegration influenced by nanoscale anodized titanium surfaces, Nanomedicine, vol.268, issue.7, pp.967-80, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199905)45:2<75::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-P
Diameter of titanium nanotubes influences anti-bacterial efficacy, Nanotechnology, vol.22, issue.29, p.295102, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1088/0957-4484/22/29/295102
Decreased Staphylococcus aureus biofilm growth on anodized nanotubular titanium and the effect of electrical stimulation, Acta Biomaterialia, vol.7, issue.7, pp.3003-3015, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.04.002
Effects of different sterilization techniques and varying anodized TiO 2 nanotube dimensions on bacteria growth, J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, vol.101, pp.677-88, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jbm.b.32870
The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment, Biomaterials, vol.31, issue.4, pp.706-719, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.081
Decontamination of titanium implant surface and re-osseointegration to treat peri-implantitis: a literature review, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, vol.27, pp.1043-54, 2012. ,
Differential response of Staphylococci and osteoblasts to varying titanium surface roughness, Biomaterials, vol.32, issue.4, pp.951-60, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.001
Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol.19, issue.17, pp.579-96, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1590/S1678-77572005000100018
A review of the application of anodization for the fabrication of nanotubes on metal implant surfaces, Acta Biomaterialia, vol.8, issue.8, pp.2875-88, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.005
In vitro assessment of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus adhesion on TiO2 nanotubes on Ti-6Al-4V alloy, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol.88, issue.7, pp.1696-705, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jbm.a.31898
Biocompatibility of ??-stabilizing elements of titanium alloys, Biomaterials, vol.25, issue.26, pp.5705-5718, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.021
. I. Phase Transformation at the Surface and in the Bulk, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol.110, issue.2, pp.927-962, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1021/jp0552473
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01204363
Biomechanical evaluation of dental implants with different surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbits, The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, vol.1, issue.2, pp.107-119, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.4047/jap.2009.1.2.107
URL : http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc2994679?pdf=render
Self-Organization of Anodic Nanotubes on Two Size Scales, Small, vol.28, issue.7, pp.888-91, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00808-3
Progress on free-standing and flow-through TiO2 nanotube membranes, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol.98, pp.24-38, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.11.004
Fabrication of TiO2 nanotubes on porous titanium scaffold and biocompatibility evaluation in vitro and in vivo, J Biomed Mater Res A, vol.100, pp.3422-3429, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jbm.a.34268
The diameter of anodic TiO2 nanotubes affects bone formation and correlates with the bone morphogenetic protein-2 expression in vivo, Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol.86, issue.3, pp.359-66, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80133-6
Effects of TiO2 nanotubes with different diameters on gene expression and osseointegration of implants in minipigs, Biomaterials, vol.32, issue.29, pp.6900-6911, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.023
Titanium dioxide nanotubes enhance bone bonding in vivo, J Biomed Mater Res A, vol.92, pp.1218-1242, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jbm.a.32463
Electrochemical growth behavior, surface properties, and enhanced in vivo bone response of TiO2 nanotubes on microstructured surfaces of blasted, screw-shaped titanium implants, International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol.5, pp.87-100, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.2147/IJN.S8012
The Titanium-Bone Cell Interface In Vitro: The Role of the Surface in Promoting Osteointegration, Titan. Med, pp.561-85, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-56486-4_17
Titanium implant surface modification by cathodic reduction in hydrofluoric acid: surface characterization and in vivo performance, J Biomed Mater Res A, vol.88, pp.581-589, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jbm.a.31898
Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants, Biomaterials, vol.27, issue.6, pp.926-962, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.009
The use of reduced healing times on ITIR implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface:. Early results from clinical trials on ITIR SLA implants, Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol.29, issue.2, pp.144-53, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jbm.820291213
A 5-year prospective multicenter study of early loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, vol.26, pp.1324-1356, 2011. ,
Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol.3, issue.7, pp.889-902, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
Immediate implants at fresh extraction sockets: bone healing in four different implant systems, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol.36, issue.(Suppl.), pp.705-716, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01427.x
Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, vol.24, pp.616-642, 2009. ,
Nanostructured titanium: the ideal material for improving orthopedic implant efficacy?, Nanomedicine, vol.92, issue.6, pp.791-794, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.040
Comparison of ultraviolet light-induced photocatalytic bactericidal effect on modified titanium implant surfaces, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, vol.26, pp.39-44, 2011. ,
Soft tissue response to titanium dioxide nanotube modified implants, Acta Biomaterialia, vol.7, issue.8, pp.3209-3224, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.003