B. Vaerenberg, C. Smits, D. Ceulaer, G. Zir, E. Harman et al., Cochlear Implant Programming: A Global Survey on the State of the Art, The Scientific World Journal, vol.21, issue.2, 2014.
DOI : 10.1159/000066154

P. Abbas and C. Brown, Electrically evoked brainstem potentials in cochlear implant patients with multi-electrode stimulation, Hearing Research, vol.36, issue.2-3, pp.153-62, 1988.
DOI : 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90057-3

A. Kasper, M. Pelizzone, and P. Montandon, Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses in Cochlear Implant Patients, ORL, vol.54, issue.6, pp.285-94, 1992.
DOI : 10.1159/000276317

E. Truy, S. Gallego, J. Chanal, L. Collet, and A. Morgon, Correlation Between Electrical Auditory Brainstem Response and Perceptual Thresholds in Digisonic Cochlear Implant Users, The Laryngoscope, vol.51, issue.1, pp.554-563, 1998.
DOI : 10.1097/00005537-199804000-00017

L. Valdes, A. Mc-laughlin, M. Viani, L. Walshe, P. Smith et al., Objective assessment of spectral ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners using cortical evoked responses to an oddball paradigm, PLoS One, vol.2014, issue.93, p.24599314

D. Bakhos, S. Roux, A. Robier, F. Bonnet-brilhault, E. Lescanne et al., Minimization of cochlear implant artifact in cortical auditory evoked potentials in children, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, vol.76, issue.11, pp.1627-1659, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.07.034

M. Hofmann and J. Wouters, Improved Electrically Evoked Auditory Steady-State Response Thresholds in Humans, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol.140, issue.6, pp.573-89, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s10162-012-0321-8

URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387309

M. Menard, S. Gallego, E. Truy, C. Berger-vachon, J. Durrant et al., Auditory steady-state response evaluation of auditory thresholds in cochlear implant patients, Int J Audiol, vol.43, issue.1, pp.39-43, 2004.

M. Mc-laughlin, L. Valdes, A. Reilly, R. Zeng, and F. , Cochlear implant artifact attenuation in late auditory evoked potentials: A single channel approach, Hearing Research, vol.302, pp.84-95, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.heares.2013.05.006

F. Viola, D. Vos, M. Hine, J. Sandmann, P. Bleeck et al., Semi-automatic attenuation of cochlear implant artifacts for the evaluation of late auditory evoked potentials, Hearing Research, vol.284, issue.1-2, pp.6-15, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.010

M. Menard, S. Gallego, C. Berger-vachon, L. Collet, and H. Thai-van, Relationship between loudness growth function and auditory steady-state response in normal-hearing subjects, Hearing Research, vol.235, issue.1-2, pp.105-118, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.heares.2007.10.007

T. Picton, M. John, A. Dimitrijevic, and D. Purcell, Human auditory steady-state responses: Respuestas auditivas de estado estable en humanos, International Journal of Audiology, vol.13, issue.4, pp.177-219, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/0168-5597(88)90029-9

R. Gransier, H. Deprez, M. Hofmann, M. Moonen, A. Van-wieringen et al., Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts, Hearing Research, vol.335, pp.149-60, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.heares.2016.03.006

M. Hofmann and J. Wouters, Electrically Evoked Auditory Steady State Responses in Cochlear Implant Users, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol.140, issue.6, pp.267-82, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s10162-009-0201-z

URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862921

O. Macherey, A. Van-wieringen, R. Carlyon, J. Deeks, and J. Wouters, Asymmetric Pulses in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Pulse Shape, Polarity, and Rate, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol.352, issue.3, pp.253-66, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s10162-006-0040-0

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00905014

A. Herdman, O. Lins, P. Van-roon, D. Stapells, M. Scherg et al., Intracerebral Sources of Human Auditory Steady-State Responses, Brain Topography, vol.15, issue.2, pp.69-86, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1021470822922

D. Merrill, M. Bikson, and J. Jefferys, Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol.141, issue.2, pp.171-98, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.10.020

W. Freeman, TUTORIAL ON NEUROBIOLOGY: FROM SINGLE NEURONS TO BRAIN CHAOS, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, vol.02, issue.03, pp.451-82, 1992.
DOI : 10.1142/S0218127492000653

B. Vaerenberg, P. Govaerts, T. Stainsby, P. Nopp, A. Gault et al., A Uniform Graphical Representation of Intensity Coding in Current-Generation Cochlear Implant Systems, Ear and Hearing, vol.35, issue.5, pp.533-576, 2014.
DOI : 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000039

D. Lella, F. Bacciu, A. Pasanisi, E. Vincenti, V. Guida et al., Main peak interleaved sampling (MPIS) strategy: Effect of stimulation rate variations on speech perception in adult cochlear implant recipients using the Digisonic SP cochlear implant, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol.24, issue.2, pp.102-109, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/S0378-5955(98)00185-3

K. Arora, P. Dawson, R. Dowell, and A. Vandali, Electrical stimulation rate effects on speech perception in cochlear implants, International Journal of Audiology, vol.28, issue.8, pp.561-568, 2009.
DOI : 10.1097/00003446-200012000-00008

R. Oostenveld, P. Fries, E. Maris, and J. Schoffelen, FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data, Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol.36, issue.3, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.041

S. Rush and D. Driscoll, Current distribution in the brain from surface electrodes. Anesthesia and analgesia, pp.717-740, 1968.

S. Goncalves, M. Jcd, J. Verbunt, F. Bijma, R. Heethaar et al., In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an eit-based method and realistic models for the head, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol.50, issue.6, pp.754-67, 2003.
DOI : 10.1109/TBME.2003.812164

N. Castaneda-villa and C. James, Independent Component Analysis for Auditory Evoked Potentials and Cochlear Implant Artifact Estimation, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol.58, issue.2, pp.348-54, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/TBME.2010.2072957

A. Bell and T. Sejnowski, An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution, Neural Computation, vol.20, issue.1, pp.1129-59, 1995.
DOI : 10.1109/78.301850

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.221.8907

T. Lee, M. Girolami, and T. Sejnowski, Independent Component Analysis Using an Extended Infomax Algorithm for Mixed Subgaussian and Supergaussian Sources, Neural Computation, vol.28, issue.46, pp.417-458, 1999.
DOI : 10.1109/72.536322

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.164.9999

J. Cardoso and A. Souloumiac, Blind beamforming for non-Gaussian signals. Radar and Signal Processing, IEE Proceedings, 1993.
DOI : 10.1049/ip-f-2.1993.0054

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.8.5684

A. Hyvarinen, Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol.10, issue.3, pp.626-660, 1999.
DOI : 10.1109/72.761722

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.297.8229

I. Akhoun, C. Mckay, and W. El-deredy, Electrically evoked compound action potential artifact rejection by independent component analysis: Technique validation, Hearing Research, vol.302, pp.60-73, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.heares.2013.04.005

URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2013.04.005

L. Timm, D. Agrawal, F. Viola, P. Sandmann, S. Debener et al., Temporal Feature Perception in Cochlear Implant Users, PLoS ONE, vol.7, issue.9, pp.45375-23028971, 2012.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0045375.s002

URL : http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045375

C. James and C. Hesse, Independent component analysis for biomedical signals. Physiological measurement, pp.15-39, 2005.
DOI : 10.1088/0967-3334/26/1/r02

S. Kullback, Information Theory and Statistics, 1959.

R. Steuer, J. Kurths, C. Daub, J. Weise, and J. Selbig, The mutual information: Detecting and evaluating dependencies between variables, Bioinformatics, vol.18, issue.Suppl 2, pp.231-271, 2002.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_2.S231

URL : http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/18/suppl_2/S231

M. Witkowski, E. Garcia-cossio, B. Chander, C. Braun, N. Birbaumer et al., Mapping entrained brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), NeuroImage, vol.140, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.024

D. Scott, Scott's rule, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, vol.51, issue.3, pp.497-502, 2010.
DOI : 10.1002/wics.103

T. Picton, A. Dimitrijevic, M. John, and P. Van-roon, The use of phase in the detection of auditory steady-state responses, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol.112, issue.9, pp.1698-711, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00608-3

A. Hyvärinen and E. Oja, Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications, Neural Networks, vol.13, issue.4-5, pp.4-5, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00026-5

A. Widmann and E. Schroger, Filter Effects and Filter Artifacts in the Analysis of Electrophysiological Data, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.3, pp.233-22787453, 2012.
DOI : 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00233

D. Acunzo, G. Mackenzie, and M. Van-rossum, Systematic biases in early ERP and ERF components as a result of high-pass filtering, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol.209, issue.1, pp.212-220, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.06.011

S. Small and D. Stapells, Artifactual Responses When Recording Auditory Steady-State Responses, Ear and Hearing, vol.25, issue.6, pp.611-634, 2004.
DOI : 10.1097/00003446-200412000-00009

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.484.7428

A. Acar, Z. Acar, C. Makeig, and S. , Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation, NeuroImage, vol.124, pp.168-80, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.032

J. Uriguen and B. Garcia-zapirain, EEG artifact removal???state-of-the-art and guidelines, Journal of Neural Engineering, vol.12, issue.3, pp.31001-25834104, 2015.
DOI : 10.1088/1741-2560/12/3/031001

S. Makeig, T. Jung, D. Ghahremani, and T. Sejnowski, Removal of muscle artifact from EEG data: comparison between stochastic (ICA and CCA) and deterministic (EMD and wavelet-based) approaches. Integrated Human Brain Science, 2000.

D. Safieddine, A. Kachenoura, L. Albera, G. Birot, A. Karfoul et al., Removal of muscle artifact from EEG data: comparison between stochastic (ICA and CCA) and deterministic (EMD and wavelet-based) approaches, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol.38, issue.1, pp.1-15, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.025

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00727762

F. Viola, J. Thorne, S. Bleeck, J. Eyles, and S. Debener, Uncovering auditory evoked potentials from cochlear implant users with independent component analysis, Psychophysiology, vol.49, issue.11, pp.1470-80, 2011.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01224.x

P. Gilley, A. Sharma, M. Dorman, C. Finley, A. Panch et al., Minimization of cochlear implant stimulus artifact in cortical auditory evoked potentials, Clinical Neurophysiology, vol.117, issue.8, pp.1772-82, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.018

B. Martin, Can the Acoustic Change Complex Be Recorded in an Individual with a Cochlear Implant? Separating Neural Responses from Cochlear Implant Artifact, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, vol.18, issue.2, pp.126-166, 2007.
DOI : 10.3766/jaaa.18.2.5

L. Friesen and T. Picton, A method for removing cochlear implant artifact, Hearing Research, vol.259, issue.1-2, pp.95-106, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.heares.2009.10.012

D. Wong and K. Gordon, Beamformer Suppression of Cochlear Implant Artifacts in an Electroencephalography Dataset, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol.56, issue.12, pp.2851-2858, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/TBME.2009.2029239

D. Cosandier-rimele, J. Badier, P. Chauvel, and F. Wendling, A Physiologically Plausible Spatio-Temporal Model for EEG Signals Recorded With Intracerebral Electrodes in Human Partial Epilepsy, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol.54, issue.3, pp.380-388, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/TBME.2006.890489

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00144531