Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Speeded saccadic and manual visuo-motor decisions: Distinct processes but same principles

Aline Bompas 1, 2, * Craig Hedge 1 Petroc Sumner 1 
* Corresponding author
2 U1028 Inserm - UMR5292 CNRS - Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team
CRNL - Centre de recherche en neurosciences de Lyon - Lyon Neuroscience Research Center
Abstract : Action decisions are considered an emergent property of competitive response activations. As such, decision mechanisms are embedded in, and therefore may differ between, different response modalities. Despite this, the saccadic eye movement system is often promoted as a model for all decisions, especially in the fields of electrophysiology and modelling. Other research traditions predominantly use manual button presses, which have different response distribution profiles and are initiated by different brain areas. Here we tested whether core concepts of action selection models (decision and non-decision times, integration of automatic and selective inputs to threshold, interference across response options, noise, etc.) generalise from saccadic to manual domains. Using two diagnostic phenomena, the remote distractor effect (RDE) and 'saccadic inhibition', we find that manual responses are also sensitive to the interference of visual distractors but to a lesser extent than saccades and during a shorter time window. A biologically-inspired model (DINASAUR, based on non-linear input dynamics) can account for both sac-cadic and manual response distributions and accuracy by simply adjusting the balance and relative timings of transient and sustained inputs, and increasing the mean and variance of non-decisional delays for manual responses. This is consistent with known neurophysio-logical and anatomical differences between saccadic and manual networks. Thus core decision principles appear to generalise across effectors, consistent with previous work, but we also conclude that key quantitative differences underlie apparent qualitative differences in the literature, such as effects being robustly reported in one modality and unreliable in another.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [93 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Aline Bompas Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, March 8, 2017 - 1:09:55 PM
Last modification on : Saturday, September 24, 2022 - 3:04:06 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Friday, June 9, 2017 - 1:22:11 PM


Publication funded by an institution




Aline Bompas, Craig Hedge, Petroc Sumner. Speeded saccadic and manual visuo-motor decisions: Distinct processes but same principles. Cognitive Psychology, Elsevier, 2017, 94, pp.26-52. ⟨10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.02.002⟩. ⟨inserm-01485194⟩



Record views


Files downloads