J. Kirkham, K. Dwan, and D. Altman, The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews, BMJ, vol.340, issue.feb15 1, p.365, 2010.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.c365

K. Raghav, S. Mahajan, and J. Yao, From Protocols to Publications: A Study in Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials in Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.33, issue.31, pp.3583-3590, 2015.
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.4148

K. Dwan, C. Gamble, P. Williamson, J. Kirkham, I. Boutron et al., Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias -an updated review Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials, PLoS One JAMA, vol.8, issue.302, pp.977-984, 2009.

R. Sylvester, M. Van-glabbeke, and L. Collette, Statistical methodology of phase III cancer clinical trials: advances and future perspectives, European Journal of Cancer, vol.38, issue.4, pp.162-168, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00442-7

B. You, H. Gan, G. Pond, and E. Chen, Consistency in the Analysis and Reporting of Primary End Points in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials From Registration to Publication: A Systematic Review, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.30, issue.2, pp.210-216, 2012.
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.0890

A. Chan, J. Bias-drazen, and F. Frizelle, spin, and misreporting: time for full access to trial protocols and results Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, PLoS Med JAMA, vol.5, issue.292, pp.1363-1364, 2004.

D. Zarin and T. Tse, Trust but Verify: Trial Registration and Determining Fidelity to the Protocol, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.159, issue.1
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-159-1-201307020-00011

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

A. Chan, A. Hrobjartsson, and M. Haahr, Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials, JAMA, vol.291, issue.20, pp.2457-2465, 2004.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457

S. Redmond, E. Von-elm, and A. Blumle, Cohort study of trials submitted to ethics committee identified discrepant reporting of outcomes in publications Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review Completeness of reporting of patient-relevant clinical trial outcomes: comparison of unpublished clinical study reports with publicly available data Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials, J Clin Epidemiol BMC Med PLoS Med BMJ Bmj N Engl J Med, vol.66, issue.364, pp.1367-1375, 2010.

A. Chan, J. Tetzlaff, and P. Gotzsche, SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials Early Versus Delayed Initiation of Concurrent Palliative Oncology Care: Patient Outcomes in the ENABLE III Randomized Controlled Trial Impact of brachytherapy on local recurrence rates after sublobar resection: results from ACOSOG Z4032 (Alliance), a phase III randomized trial for high-risk operable non-small-cell lung cancer, BMJ J Clin Oncol J Clin Oncol, vol.346, issue.20, pp.7586-7604, 2013.

T. Tse, R. Williams, and D. Zarin, Reporting ???Basic Results??? in ClinicalTrials.gov, Chest, vol.136, issue.1, pp.295-303, 2009.
DOI : 10.1378/chest.08-3022

URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2821287

D. Zarin, T. Tse, and N. Ide, Trial Registration at ClinicalTrials.gov between May and October 2005, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.353, issue.26, pp.2779-2787, 2005.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMsa053234

P. Williamson and M. Clarke, The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative, Trials, vol.12, issue.Suppl 1
DOI : 10.1186/1745-6215-12-S1-A70

A. Chan, R. Upshur, and J. Singh, Research protocols: waiving confidentiality for the greater good The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists, Initiative: Its Role in Improving Cochrane Reviews, pp.1086-1089, 2006.

J. Larkin, V. Chiarion-sileni, and R. Gonzalez, Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma Effect of routine assessment of specific psychosocial problems on personalized communication, counselors' awareness, and distress levels in cancer genetic counseling practice: a randomized controlled trial Reporting discrepancies between the ClinicalTrials.gov results database and peer-reviewed publications, 29. Riveros C, Dechartres A, Perrodeau E et al. Timing and completeness of trial results posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in journals, pp.23-34, 2013.

B. Goldacre, H. Drysdale, and A. Powell-smith, The COMPare Trials Project. In. 2016. 31. Cannistra SA. New initiatives at Journal of Clinical Oncology, J Clin Oncol, vol.29, pp.2609-2610, 2011.