Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol.76, issue.2, pp.98-113, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00001648-199911000-00019
Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.206, issue.4, pp.331-332, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.026
Searching for the Optimal Rate of Medically Necessary Cesarean Delivery, Birth, vol.367, issue.3, pp.237-280, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1111/birt.12104
Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys, The Lancet Global Health, vol.3, issue.5, pp.260-70, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X
Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007???08, The Lancet, vol.375, issue.9713, pp.490-499, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5
Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health, BMC Medicine, vol.107, issue.1, p.71, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.08.013
Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.207, issue.1, pp.14-29, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.007
Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.205, issue.3, pp.262-263, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035
Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a handbook World Health Organization, 2009. ,
Cesarean Section Rates and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality in Low-, Medium-, and High-Income Countries: An Ecological Study, Birth, vol.367, issue.6, pp.270-277, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1093/ije/30.6.1343
Correlation of Cesarean rates to maternal and infant mortality rates: an ecologic study of official international data. Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, pp.303-311, 2011. ,
Caesarean section in the world: a new ecological approach, J Prev Med Hyg, vol.52, issue.4, pp.161-73, 2011. ,
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, BMJ, vol.339, issue.jul21 1, p.2535, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.b2535
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>, JAMA, vol.283, issue.15, pp.2008-2020, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
Modern epidemiology, 1998. ,
The Quality of Modern Cross-Sectional Ecologic Studies: A Bibliometric Review, American Journal of Epidemiology, vol.174, issue.10, pp.1101-1108, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1093/aje/kwr241
Caesarean section rates in the Arab region: a cross-national study, Health Policy and Planning, vol.19, issue.2, pp.101-111, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1093/heapol/czh012
Maternal mortality, stillbirth and measures of obstetric care in developing and developed countries, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol.77, issue.(9438), pp.139-185, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.10.010
The epidemiologic paradox of low birth weight in Brazil, Revista de Sa??de P??blica, vol.44, issue.5, pp.767-75, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1590/S0034-89102010005000033
Response to Rezaeian: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) extension for ecological studies, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.67, issue.7, pp.837-845, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.011
A call for revising the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology statement to include ecologic studies, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.67, issue.7, pp.836-843, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.010
The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division. Trends in Maternal Mortality The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division, 1990. ,
Reliability of data on caesarean sections in developing countries, Bull World Health Organ, vol.83, issue.6, pp.449-55, 2005. ,
C-Model: a global reference for caesarean section rates, BJOG, 2015. ,
Classifications for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review, PLoS ONE, vol.92, issue.Suppl 1, p.14566, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0014566.s006
A Systematic Review of the Robson Classification for Caesarean Section: What Works, Doesn't Work and How to Improve It, PLoS ONE, vol.47, issue.6, p.97769, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0097769.s003
Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.27, issue.2, pp.297-308, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.004