A. Betran, M. Merialdi, J. Lauer, W. Bing-shun, J. Thomas et al., Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates, Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol.76, issue.2, pp.98-113, 2007.
DOI : 10.1097/00001648-199911000-00019

L. Gibbons, J. Belizan, J. Lauer, A. Betran, M. Merialdi et al., Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.206, issue.4, pp.331-332, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.026

J. Ye, A. Betran, M. Vela, J. Souza, and J. Zhang, Searching for the Optimal Rate of Medically Necessary Cesarean Delivery, Birth, vol.367, issue.3, pp.237-280, 2014.
DOI : 10.1111/birt.12104

J. Vogel, A. Betran, N. Vindevoghel, J. Souza, M. Torloni et al., Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys, The Lancet Global Health, vol.3, issue.5, pp.260-70, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70094-X

P. Lumbiganon, M. Laopaiboon, A. Gulmezoglu, J. Souza, S. Taneepanichskul et al., Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007???08, The Lancet, vol.375, issue.9713, pp.490-499, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5

J. Souza, A. Gulmezoglu, P. Lumbiganon, M. Laopaiboon, G. Carroli et al., Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health, BMC Medicine, vol.107, issue.1, p.71, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.08.013

I. Timor-tritsch and A. Monteagudo, Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.207, issue.1, pp.14-29, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.007

N. Marshall, R. Fu, and J. Guise, Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.205, issue.3, pp.262-263, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035

U. Who and U. Amdd, Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a handbook World Health Organization, 2009.

F. Althabe, C. Sosa, J. Belizan, L. Gibbons, F. Jacquerioz et al., Cesarean Section Rates and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality in Low-, Medium-, and High-Income Countries: An Ecological Study, Birth, vol.367, issue.6, pp.270-277, 2006.
DOI : 10.1093/ije/30.6.1343

F. Volpe, Correlation of Cesarean rates to maternal and infant mortality rates: an ecologic study of official international data. Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, pp.303-311, 2011.

A. Zizza, A. Tinelli, A. Malvasi, E. Barbone, M. Stark et al., Caesarean section in the world: a new ecological approach, J Prev Med Hyg, vol.52, issue.4, pp.161-73, 2011.

D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. Altman, and P. Group, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, BMJ, vol.339, issue.jul21 1, p.2535, 2009.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.b2535

D. Stroup, J. Berlin, S. Morton, I. Olkin, G. Williamson et al., Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>, JAMA, vol.283, issue.15, pp.2008-2020, 2000.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008

K. Rothman and S. Greenland, Modern epidemiology, 1998.

B. Dufault and N. Klar, The Quality of Modern Cross-Sectional Ecologic Studies: A Bibliometric Review, American Journal of Epidemiology, vol.174, issue.10, pp.1101-1108, 2011.
DOI : 10.1093/aje/kwr241

R. Jurdi and M. Khawaja, Caesarean section rates in the Arab region: a cross-national study, Health Policy and Planning, vol.19, issue.2, pp.101-111, 2004.
DOI : 10.1093/heapol/czh012

E. Mcclure, R. Goldenberg, and C. Bann, Maternal mortality, stillbirth and measures of obstetric care in developing and developed countries, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol.77, issue.(9438), pp.139-185, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.10.010

A. Silva, L. Silva, M. Barbieri, H. Bettiol, L. Carvalho et al., The epidemiologic paradox of low birth weight in Brazil, Revista de Sa??de P??blica, vol.44, issue.5, pp.767-75, 2010.
DOI : 10.1590/S0034-89102010005000033

M. Cevallos, C. Poole, E. Von-elm, D. Altman, and E. Strobe, Response to Rezaeian: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) extension for ecological studies, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.67, issue.7, pp.837-845, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.011

M. Rezaeian, A call for revising the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology statement to include ecologic studies, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.67, issue.7, pp.836-843, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.02.010

U. Who and U. , The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division. Trends in Maternal Mortality The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division, 1990.

C. Stanton, D. Dubourg, D. Brouwere, V. Pujades, M. Ronsmans et al., Reliability of data on caesarean sections in developing countries, Bull World Health Organ, vol.83, issue.6, pp.449-55, 2005.

J. Souza, C-Model: a global reference for caesarean section rates, BJOG, 2015.

M. Torloni, A. Betran, J. Souza, M. Widmer, T. Allen et al., Classifications for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review, PLoS ONE, vol.92, issue.Suppl 1, p.14566, 2011.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0014566.s006

A. Betran, N. Vindevoghel, J. Souza, A. Gulmezoglu, and M. Torloni, A Systematic Review of the Robson Classification for Caesarean Section: What Works, Doesn't Work and How to Improve It, PLoS ONE, vol.47, issue.6, p.97769, 2014.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0097769.s003

M. Robson, L. Hartigan, and M. Murphy, Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.27, issue.2, pp.297-308, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.004