H. H. Barrett, Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol.7, issue.7, pp.1266-1278, 1990.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.7.001266

H. H. Barrett, J. L. Denny, R. F. Wagner, and K. J. Myers, Objective assessment of image quality II Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol.12, issue.5, pp.834-852, 1995.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.12.000834

H. H. Barrett, C. K. Abbey, and E. Clarkson, Objective assessment of image quality III ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol.15, issue.6, pp.1520-1535, 1998.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.15.001520

J. P. Rolland and H. H. Barrett, Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol.9, issue.5, pp.649-658, 1992.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.9.000649

T. Narayan and G. Herman, Prediction of human observer performance by numerical observers: an experimental study, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol.16, issue.3, pp.679-693, 1999.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.16.000679

C. K. Abbey and H. H. Barrett, Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol.18, issue.3, pp.473-521, 2001.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.18.000473

P. Bruyant, H. Gifford, G. Gindi, P. Pretorius, M. King et al., Human and numerical observer studies of lesion detection in Ga-67 images obtained with MAP-EM reconstructions and anatomical priors, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004., pp.4072-4075, 2004.
DOI : 10.1109/NSSMIC.2004.1466788

B. D. Gallas and H. H. Barrett, Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol.20, issue.9, pp.1725-1738, 2003.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.20.001725

S. Daly, Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity, Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display III, pp.179-206, 1993.
DOI : 10.1117/12.135952

]. A. Watson and J. Solomon, Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol.14, issue.9, pp.2379-91, 1997.
DOI : 10.1364/JOSAA.14.002379

L. Zhang, C. Cavaro-ménard, P. L. Callet, and L. H. Cooper, The effects of anatomical information and observer expertise on abnormality detection task, Medical Imaging 2011: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 2011.
DOI : 10.1117/12.877590

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00855981

B. Goossens, L. Plati?a, E. Vansteenkiste, and W. Philips, The use of steerable channels for detecting asymmetrical signals with random orientations, Medical Imaging 2010: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, pp.76270-76270, 2010.
DOI : 10.1117/12.843782

S. Park, Performance of a channelized-ideal observer using Laguerre-Gauss channels for detecting a Gaussian signal at a known location in different lumpy backgrounds, Medical Imaging 2006: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, pp.61460-61460, 2006.
DOI : 10.1117/12.653931

C. Castella, K. Kinkel, F. Descombes, M. Eckstein, P. Sottas et al., Mammographic texture synthesis: second-generation clustered lumpy backgrounds using a genetic algorithm, Optics Express, vol.16, issue.11, pp.7595-7607, 2008.
DOI : 10.1364/OE.16.007595.m001

S. Park, A. Badano, B. D. Gallas, and K. J. Myers, Incorporating Human Contrast Sensitivity in Model Observers for Detection Tasks, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.28, issue.3, pp.339-347, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/TMI.2008.929096

H. Chan, B. Sahiner, R. F. Wagner, and N. Petrick, Classifier design for computer-aided diagnosis: Effects of finite sample size on the mean performance of classical and neural network classifiers, Medical Physics, vol.4, issue.12, pp.2654-68, 1999.
DOI : 10.1118/1.598805