HEALTH CARE POLICY:Outcomes Research: Measuring the End Results of Health Care, Science, vol.282, issue.5387, pp.245-251, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1126/science.282.5387.245
Outcomes research and epidemiology: the synergy between public health and clinical practice Guidance for industry, 257?9. 3. US Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS), 2011. ,
Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims, 2009. ,
Generic Health Measurement: Past Accomplishments and a Measurement Paradigm for the 21st Century, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.127, issue.8_Part_2, pp.743-50, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_Part_2-199710151-00061
Outcomes Management, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.318, issue.23, pp.1549-56, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM198806093182329
Health Status, Quality of Life, and the Individual, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.272, issue.8, pp.630-631, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1994.03520080072047
Longitudinal Construct Validity, Medical Care, vol.38, pp.84-90, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00005650-200009002-00013
Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.50, issue.8, pp.869-79, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00097-8
Interpretation of change scores in ordinal clinical scales and health status measures: The whole may not equal the sum of the parts, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.49, issue.7, pp.711-718, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00016-9
Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.63, issue.5, pp.524-558, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.010
Sensitivity to Change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: Part 1, Physical Therapy, vol.78, issue.11, pp.1186-96, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1093/ptj/78.11.1186
An integrated method to determine meaningful changes in health-related quality of life, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.57, issue.11, pp.1153-60, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.04.004
Defining the Minimum Level of Detectable Change for the Roland-Morris Questionnaire, Physical Therapy, vol.76, issue.4, pp.359-65, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1093/ptj/76.4.359
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol.14, issue.1, p.82, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00586-005-0997-0
Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain, The Journal of Pain, vol.4, issue.7, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1526-5900(03)00716-8
Patient-perceived satisfactory improvement (PPSI): Interpreting meaningful change in pain from the patient???s perspective, Pain, vol.121, issue.1, pp.151-158, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.pain.2005.12.021
Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol.64, issue.1, pp.29-33, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1136/ard.2004.022905
Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale, Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol.38, issue.6, pp.639-682, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1067/mem.2001.118012
Understanding changes in health status. Is the floor phenomenon merely the last step of the staircase? Med Care, pp.1-15, 1997. ,
On the Theory of Scales of Measurement, Science, vol.103, issue.2684, pp.677-80, 1946. ,
DOI : 10.1126/science.103.2684.677
Determining Clinically Important Differences in Health Status Measures, PharmacoEconomics, vol.15, issue.2, pp.141-55, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.2165/00019053-199915020-00003
Item Response Theory for Psychologists: L. Erlbaum Associates, 2000. ,
Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care, Soc Sci Med, vol.54, pp.493-504, 2002. ,
The Patient Judgments of Hospital Quality (PJHQ) Questionnaire. Med Care, pp.17-25, 1990. ,
The MOS 36?item short?form health survey (SF?36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care, pp.473-83, 1992. ,
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, pp.1-55, 1999. ,
Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.4135/9781412984676
Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, vol.8, issue.3, 1951. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF02310555
) How PRO measures are psychometrically validated? A review of publications on primary validation ,
Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data, BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol.20, issue.1, p.33, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1002/gps.1360
Comparison requires stability. Rash Measurement Trans, p.506, 1996. ,
Comparing alternative Rasch?based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health. Med Care, pp.25-36, 2004. ,
Nonparametric item response theory using Stata, Stata Journal, vol.11, pp.30-51, 2011. ,
Stata Statistical Software: Release 12.1. College Station, p.2012 ,
Rumm2030: Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Models [computer software]. Perth, Western Australia: RUMM Laboratory, 2010. ,
Health status assessment for the twenty?first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing, Quality of Life Research, vol.6, issue.6, pp.595-600, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1018420418455
Clinically relevant, statistically significant, or both? Minimal important change in the individual subject revisited, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.64, issue.12, pp.1467-1475, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.014