The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration.

Lucy Turner; Isabelle Boutron; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Douglas Altman; David Moher

doi:10.1186/2046-4053-2-79

Journal articles

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration.

Lucy Turner ^{1, *} Isabelle Boutron ^{2, 3} Asbjørn Hróbjartsson ⁴ Douglas Altman ⁵ David Moher ^{1, 6}

* Corresponding author

1 Ottawa Hospital's Ethics Board

2 Centre d'Epidémiologie Clinique

3 U738 / UMR_S738 - Modèles et méthodes de l'évaluation thérapeutique des maladies chroniques

4 Clinical Pharmacology, Epidemiology and Clinical Trials

5 Centre for Statistics in Medicine

6 Epidemiology and Community Medicine

Abstract : : The global evidence base for health care is extensive, and expanding; with nearly 2 million articles published annually. One estimate suggests 75 trials and 11 systematic reviews are published daily.

Document type :

Journal articles

Domain :

Life Sciences [q-bio] / Santé publique et épidémiologie

Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [125 references] Display Hide Download

https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00871888
Contributor : Ed. BMC Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, October 11, 2013 - 1:07:49 AM
Last modification on : Saturday, June 25, 2022 - 8:53:49 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Sunday, January 12, 2014 - 4:28:38 AM

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration.

Files

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Export

Metrics

108

187

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration.

Files

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Export

Share

Metrics

108

187