Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Mycophenolic Acid Is Value for (Little) Money, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol.90, issue.2, pp.203-207, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181d75952
Mycophenolate Mofetil Monitoring: Is There Evidence That It Can Improve Outcomes?, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol.48, issue.2, pp.204-210, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMoa067411
A retrospective analysis of mycophenolic acid and cyclosporin concentrations with acute rejection in renal transplant recipients, Clinical Biochemistry, vol.34, issue.1, pp.77-81, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0009-9120(00)00196-X
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Mycophenolic Acid in Renal Transplant Recipients, Transplantation Proceedings, vol.37, issue.2, pp.859-60, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.238
Comparison of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetic parameters in kidney transplant patients within the first 3 months post-transplant, Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, vol.47, issue.1, pp.27-34, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007691-200102000-00007
The Influence of Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Azathioprine and Mycophenolic Acid Pharmacokinetics on the Incidence of Acute Rejection and Infectious Complications After Renal Transplantation, Transplantation Proceedings, vol.37, issue.4, pp.1751-1754, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.03.072
Clinical efficacy and toxicity profile of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in relation to combined long-term pharmacokinetics in de novo renal allograft recipients, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol.75, issue.5, pp.434-481, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.clpt.2003.12.009
A Comparison of Observational Studies and Randomized, Controlled Trials, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.342, issue.25, pp.1878-86, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM200006223422506
Innovation in surgery: the rules of evidence, The American Journal of Surgery, vol.183, issue.4, pp.399-405, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00825-5
A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND, MULTICENTER PLASMA CONCENTRATION CONTROLLED STUDY OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ORAL MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL FOR THE PREVENTION OF ACUTE REJECTION AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION1, Transplantation, vol.68, issue.2, pp.261-267, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007890-199907270-00018
Individualized Mycophenolate Mofetil Dosing Based on Drug Exposure Significantly Improves Patient Outcomes After Renal Transplantation, American Journal of Transplantation, vol.82, issue.1, pp.2496-503, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007691-200412000-00005
Comparing Mycophenolate Mofetil Regimens for de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: The Fixed-Dose Concentration-Controlled Trial, Transplantation, vol.86, issue.8, pp.1043-51, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1097/TP.0b013e318186f98a
Renal Transplant Patients at High Risk of Acute Rejection Benefit From Adequate Exposure to Mycophenolic Acid, Transplantation, vol.89, issue.5, pp.595-604, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ca7d84
Maximum A Posteriori Bayesian Estimation of Mycophenolic Acid Pharmacokinetics in Renal Transplant Recipients at Different Postgrafting Periods, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol.27, issue.3, pp.354-61, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.ftd.0000162231.90811.38
Early Steroid Withdrawal and Optimization of Mycophenolic Acid Exposure in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Mycophenolate Mofetil, Transplantation, vol.92, issue.11, pp.1244-51, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/TP.0b013e318234e134
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01151208
Feasibility of, and critical paths for mycophenolate mofetil Bayesian dose adjustment: Pharmacological re-appraisal of a concentration-controlled versus fixed-dose trial in renal transplant recipients, Pharmacological Research, vol.61, issue.2, pp.167-74, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.phrs.2009.09.006
Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolates in kidney transplantation: report of The Transplantation Society consensus meeting, Transplantation Reviews, vol.25, issue.2, pp.58-64, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.trre.2011.01.002
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01151023
Consensus Report on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Mycophenolic Acid in Solid Organ Transplantation, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol.5, issue.2, pp.341-58, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.2215/CJN.07111009
Large Scale Analysis of Routine Dose Adjustments of Mycophenolate Mofetil Based on Global Exposure in Renal Transplant Patients, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol.33, issue.3, pp.285-94, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31821633a6
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00590457
JM: an R package for the Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Time-toevent Data, J Stat Softw, vol.35, pp.1-33, 2010. ,
Joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data: an overview, Stat Sin, vol.14, pp.809-843, 2004. ,
Joint longitudinal-survival-cure models and their application to prostate cancer, Stat Sin, vol.14, pp.835-62, 2004. ,
Mod??lisation conjointe de donn??es longitudinales quantitatives et de d??lais censur??s, Revue d'??pid??miologie et de Sant?? Publique, vol.52, issue.6, pp.502-512, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0398-7620(04)99090-6
Time-Varying Belatacept Exposure and Its Relationship to Efficacy/Safety Responses in Kidney-Transplant Recipients, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol.58, issue.2, pp.251-258, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1038/clpt.2012.84
Dynamic Predictions and Prospective Accuracy in Joint Models for Longitudinal and Time-to-Event Data, Biometrics, vol.63, issue.9, pp.819-848, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01546.x
Banff 07 Classification of Renal Allograft Pathology: Updates and Future Directions, American Journal of Transplantation, vol.23, issue.4, pp.753-60, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00299.x
Fundamentals of Survival Data, Biometrics, vol.50, issue.1, pp.13-22, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00013.x
Multiple-Imputation-Based Residuals and Diagnostic Plots for Joint Models of Longitudinal and Survival Outcomes, Biometrics, vol.53, issue.1, pp.20-29, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01273.x
The Weight of Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Mycophenolic Acid in Prediction of Rejection Outcome: The Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis, Transplantation Proceedings, vol.38, issue.1, pp.86-95, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.11.084
Monitoring of mycophenolic acid in pediatric renal transplant recipients, Transplantation Proceedings, vol.33, issue.1-2, pp.1040-1043, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0041-1345(00)02322-8
Mycophenolic Acid Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics Provide a Basis for Rational Monitoring Strategies, American Journal of Transplantation, vol.48, issue.5, pp.534-576, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007691-200108000-00001
Time-dependent clearance of mycophenolic acid in renal transplant recipients, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol.41, issue.6, pp.741-52, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.ftd.0000199358.80013.bd
Patient management by Neoral C2 monitoring: An international consensus statement1, Transplantation, vol.73, issue.Supplement, pp.12-20, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007890-200205151-00003
Comparison of Low Versus High Tacrolimus Levels in Kidney Transplantation: Assessment of Efficacy by Protocol Biopsies, Transplantation, vol.83, issue.4, pp.411-417, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.tp.0000251807.72246.7d
Tacrolimus versus ciclosporin as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised trial data, BMJ, vol.331, issue.7520, pp.810-831, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.38569.471007.AE
Randomized trial of cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy with steroid withdrawal in living-donor renal transplantation: 5-year follow-up, Transplant International, vol.7, issue.2, pp.147-54, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2009.00955.x
Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine for early steroid withdrawal after renal transplantation, Journal of Nephrology, vol.25, issue.1, pp.43-52, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.5301/jn.5000070
How Delayed Graft Function Impacts Exposure to Mycophenolic Acid in Patients After Renal Transplantation, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol.33, issue.2, pp.155-64, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/FTD.0b013e31820c0a96
Preliminary study evaluating the risk factors of kidney acute rejection, Centr Eur J Immunol, vol.36, pp.233-239, 2011. ,
Polymorphisms in type I and II inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase genes and association with clinical outcome in patients on mycophenolate mofetil, Pharmacogenetics and Genomics, vol.20, issue.9, pp.537-580, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1097/FPC.0b013e32833d8cf5
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00494526