Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium. - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles BMC Public Health Year : 2012

Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium.

(1, 2) , (3) , (3) , (1) , (4) , (5, 6) , (7) , (8) , (4) , (7) , (8) , (9) , (10) , (11) , (11) , (12) , (6, 7) , (13, 14) , (15, 13) , (16) , (6, 11) , (7) , (11) , (3, 17)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Solja Nyberg
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 921919
Katriina Heikkilä
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 923964
Lars Alfredsson
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 923965
de Dirk Bacquer
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 923966
Annalisa Casini
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 923969
Els Clays
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 923970
France Kittel
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 923971
Markku Koskenvuo
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 923972
Anders Knutsson
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 923973
Constanze Leineweber
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 899159
Linda Magnusson Hanson
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 923974
Peter Westerholm
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 899162
Töres Theorell
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 899161

Abstract

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Job strain (i.e., high job demands combined with low job control) is a frequently used indicator of harmful work stress, but studies have often used partial versions of the complete multi-item job demands and control scales. Understanding whether the different instruments assess the same underlying concepts has crucial implications for the interpretation of findings across studies, harmonisation of multi-cohort data for pooled analyses, and design of future studies. As part of the 'IPD-Work' (Individual-participant-data meta-analysis in working populations) consortium, we compared different versions of the demands and control scales available in 17 European cohort studies. METHODS: Six of the 17 studies had information on the complete scales and 11 on partial scales. Here, we analyse individual level data from 70 751 participants of the studies which had complete scales (5 demand items, 6 job control items). RESULTS: We found high Pearson correlation coefficients between complete scales of job demands and control relative to scales with at least three items (r > 0.90) and for partial scales with two items only (r = 0.76-0.88). In comparison with scores from the complete scales, the agreement between job strain definitions was very good when only one item was missing in either the demands or the control scale (kappa > 0.80); good for job strain assessed with three demand items and all six control items (kappa > 0.68) and moderate to good when items were missing from both scales (kappa = 0.54-0.76). The sensitivity was >0.80 when only one item was missing from either scale, decreasing when several items were missing in one or both job strain subscales. CONCLUSIONS: Partial job demand and job control scales with at least half of the items of the complete scales, and job strain indices based on one complete and one partial scale, seemed to assess the same underlying concepts as the complete survey instruments.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
1471-2458-12-62.pdf (171.84 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Vignette du fichier
1471-2458-12-62-S1.DOC (45.5 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Vignette du fichier
1471-2458-12-62-S2.DOC (172 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Vignette du fichier
1471-2458-12-62.xml (106.26 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Publisher files allowed on an open archive
Format : Other
Format : Other
Format : Other
Loading...

Dates and versions

inserm-00688477 , version 1 (17-04-2012)

Identifiers

Cite

Eleonor Fransson, Solja Nyberg, Katriina Heikkilä, Lars Alfredsson, de Dirk Bacquer, et al.. Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium.. BMC Public Health, 2012, 12 (1), pp.62. ⟨10.1186/1471-2458-12-62⟩. ⟨inserm-00688477⟩
226 View
170 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More