Planning for the next influenza H1N1 season: a modelling study. - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles BMC Infectious Diseases Year : 2010

Planning for the next influenza H1N1 season: a modelling study.

(1, 2) , (1) , (3) , (3) , (1)
1
2
3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The level of herd immunity before and after the first 2009 pandemic season is not precisely known, and predicting the shape of the next pandemic H1N1 season is a difficult challenge. METHODS: This was a modelling study based on data on medical visits for influenza-like illness collected by the French General Practitioner Sentinel network, as well as pandemic H1N1 vaccination coverage rates, and an individual-centred model devoted to influenza. We estimated infection attack rates during the first 2009 pandemic H1N1 season in France, and the rates of pre- and post-exposure immunity. We then simulated various scenarios in which a pandemic influenza H1N1 virus would be reintroduced into a population with varying levels of protective cross-immunity, and considered the impact of extending influenza vaccination. RESULTS: During the first pandemic season in France, the proportion of infected persons was 18.1% overall, 38.3% among children, 14.8% among younger adults and 1.6% among the elderly. The rates of pre-exposure immunity required to fit data collected during the first pandemic season were 36% in younger adults and 85% in the elderly. We estimated that the rate of post-exposure immunity was 57.3% (95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) 49.6%-65.0%) overall, 44.6% (95%CI 35.5%-53.6%) in children, 53.8% (95%CI 44.5%-63.1%) in younger adults, and 87.4% (95%CI 82.0%-92.8%) in the elderly.The shape of a second season would depend on the degree of persistent protective cross-immunity to descendants of the 2009 H1N1 viruses. A cross-protection rate of 70% would imply that only a small proportion of the population would be affected. With a cross-protection rate of 50%, the second season would have a disease burden similar to the first, while vaccination of 50% of the entire population, in addition to the population vaccinated during the first pandemic season, would halve this burden. With a cross-protection rate of 30%, the second season could be more substantial, and vaccination would not provide a significant benefit. CONCLUSIONS: These model-based findings should help to prepare for a second pandemic season, and highlight the need for studies of the different components of immune protection.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
1471-2334-10-301.pdf (410.92 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Vignette du fichier
1471-2334-10-301.xml (78.11 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Publisher files allowed on an open archive
Format : Other
Loading...

Dates and versions

inserm-00668438 , version 1 (09-02-2012)

Identifiers

Cite

Fabrice Carrat, Camille Pelat, Daniel Levy-Bruhl, Isabelle Bonmarin, Nathanael Lapidus. Planning for the next influenza H1N1 season: a modelling study.. BMC Infectious Diseases, 2010, 10 (1), pp.301. ⟨10.1186/1471-2334-10-301⟩. ⟨inserm-00668438⟩
235 View
166 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More