The importance of fungal infections in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) was recently underlined by the EPIC Study II, since fungal agents represented 19% of positive isolates 1. Moreover, candidemia still raises numerous therapeutic issues to Intensive Care physicians. The relationship between prognosis and early initiation of the adequate antifungal therapy is well established 234. Ideally, adequate therapy must be started much before candidemia is ascertained, therefore much before the causative Candida species is identified and its susceptibility to antifungals is known. Broad spectrum antifungals have enriched the therapeutic arsenal in the past few years. The above therapeutic constraints might tempt clinicians to use these agents widely. However, apart from financial aspects, an excessive usage could become deleterious by resulting in the selection of strains with reduced susceptibility.

In a prospective multicenter observational study named AmarCand performed to assess the current epidemiology, management and prognosis of invasive Candida infections in French ICUs, we demonstrated that 95.6% of C. albicans strains were susceptible to fluconazole whereas only 68% of non-albicans Candida were susceptible 5. Thus, among data that could guide the choice of initial therapy, the availability of elements that would allow a binary distinction, with sufficient liability, between albicans or non-albicans Candida could represent an interesting first step.

In the present paper, the characteristics of patients from the AmarCand study, on ICU admission and at the onset of candidemia, are described according to whether candidemia was due to an albicans or a non-albicans Candida strain.

A total of 271 evaluable patients were included in the AmarCand study between October 2005 and May 2006. A total of 101 ICUs participated: 44 (43.6%) medico-surgical ICUs, 28 (27.7%) medical ICUs and 29 (28.7%) surgical ICUs.

For the purposes of the present paper, we excluded from the 271 evaluable patients: 87 patients with invasive candidiasis but no candidemia, 13 patients with mixed candidemia due to albicans and non-albicans Candida species, and 35 patients who acquired candidemia before admission in ICU. Therefore, 136 patients were included in the present analysis.

Candidemia was due to C. albicans in 78 (57.4%) patients. It was due to non-albicans Candida species in 58 (42.6%) patients. In total, 63 non-albicans Candida isolates were identified: C. glabrata n = 25, C. parapsilosis n = 12, C. tropicalis n = 9, C. kefyr n = 4, C. krusei n = 6 and other species n = 7. In vitro susceptibility to fluconazole was determined for 112 isolates. The rate of fluconazole-R or S-DD Candida was 3.3% (2/61) for C. albicans, 50.0% (10/20) for C. glabrata, 18.2% (2/11) for C. parapsilosis, 100% (3/3) for C. krusei, 25% (2/8) for C. tropicalis, 0% (0/4) for C. kefyr, and 40% (2/5) for the remaining Candida species. Susceptibility to fluconazole was determined for 61 episodes of candidemia due to C. albicans and for 47 episodes due to non-albicans Candida species. The rate of episodes due to a fluconazole-R or S-DD Candida was 3.3% and 38.3%, respectively (P < 0.0001).

Table 1 provides the major characteristics of patients on admission in ICU. The only significant differences observed between both types of candidemia were the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) and the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, which were significantly higher in case of infection with C. albicans.

The time from ICU admission to onset of candidemia was 13.8 ± 16.1 days. It was significantly shorter in the case of candidemia due to C. albicans: 11.1 ± 14.2 days vs. 17.4 ± 17.7 days with non-albicans Candida species (P = 0.02). Candidemia developed within six days after admission in ICU for 59 patients. Such an early infection was significantly more frequent when candidemia was due to C. albicans than when it was due to non-albicans Candida species (40/78 vs. 19/58, P = 0.03). Neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <500 cells/mm³) was concomitant to candidemia in nine patients. It was significantly more frequent when candidemia was caused by non-albicans Candida species than when it was caused by C. albicans (7/58 vs. 2/78, P = 0.04).

The main features of the patients' care at the onset of candidemia are shown in Table 2. There were no significant differences between the two patient groups, notably for previous exposure to azole agents.

In this study, the characteristics of patients with candidemia caused by non-albicans Candida species versus Candida albicans in ICU were compared. The main result is that only a few significant differences were observed: severity of the disease, the time to candidemia onset and the rate of underlying neutropenia. So, we did not identify a parameter pertinent enough to allow a binary distinction between albicans or non-albicans Candida and to guide the choice of empirical antifungal therapy.

Studies that compare the epidemiological characteristics of patients with candidemia caused by non-albicans Candida species versus Candida albicans are scarce and their results are disparate.

Three studies included patients who were not all adults and/or not all admitted in ICU. Cheng et al. retrospectively analyzed 130 cases of fatal candidemia due to either a C. albicans (n = 68) or a non-albicans C. species (n = 62) 9. Multivariate analyses showed that factors independently associated with C. albicans infection were the age ≥65 years, hyperleukocytosis (>15,000 cells/mm³), and immunosuppressant therapy. Shorr et al. retrospectively analyzed the files of 245 candidemic patients from two different hospitals 10. C. albicans represented 52% of the causative species. None of the parameters describing severity of the disease and previous exposition to azole agents was significantly predictive of a candidemia due to a non-albicans Candida strain. The third report arises from a large registry of 2,019 patients included between July 2004 and March 2008 in 23 North American hospitals 11. Underlying hematological malignancy and bone marrow grafting were less common in patients with a candidemia due to C. albicans. Prior antifungal therapy was reported in 43% of the 2,019 patients. It was significantly less frequent in patients with C. albicans infection (38.8% vs. 46.5%, P < 0.001).

Three other studies were performed exclusively in ICU. In Australia Playford et al. carried out a three-year prospective, national survey 12. A total of 179 episodes of candidemia were studied, of which 62% were related to C. albicans. Factors associated independently with a candidemia not related to C. albicans were recent intra-abdominal surgery and recent exposition to systemic antifungal therapy. Chow et al. compared 79 patients with candidemia due to C. albicans and 67 patients with candidemia due to non-albicans Candida species 13. Previous exposition to azole agents, duration of central venous catheter implantation and the number of antimicrobial agents per day were associated with non-albicans Candida infection in multivariate analyses. Conversely, the duration of parenteral nutrition was associated with a reduced risk of non-albicans Candida infection. Finally, 189 candidemic patients (C. albicans: 56%) were included in the international, multicenter, retrospective study of Holley et al. 14. Factors associated independently with candidemia due to non-albicans Candida species were female gender and duration of central venous catheter implantation using multivariate analysis.

Our results obtained in 136 episodes of candidemia contrast with those of the three above studies performed in ICU 121314. Indeed, neither intra-abdominal surgery, previous exposure to azole agents, duration of central venous catheter implantation, nor female gender were associated with non-albicans Candida infection. Our results are however in line with those of Shorr et al., who could not identify clearly any parameter associated with the Candida species causative of candidemia 10.

Several consensual recommendations for the management of invasive Candida infections have been published in the last few years. In the French recommendations, which go back to 2004, the algorithm takes into account previous exposition to azole agents 15. Empirical treatment based on fluconazole is proposed for patients who had not been exposed previously to azole agents. The 2009 North American recommendations propose empirical broad-spectrum treatment with an echinocandin for all ICU patients irrespective of previous exposition to azole agents 16. Both recommendations propose to continue therapy with de-escalation if the causative strain is susceptible to fluconazole. Our results showing a high incidence (38.3%) of fluconazole non-susceptible Candida, and no pertinent parameter able to predict the species of causative Candida suggest that, in France and probably the rest of Europe, the use of the North American recommendation may now be more adequate. The use of echinocandin as first-line treatment (before the identification of the causative Candida strain and determination of its susceptibility) for all ICU patients suffering from candidemia could decrease the incidence of inappropriate empirical antifungal therapy and thus improve outcome of patients with such invasive candidiasis 3. A de-escalation could be proposed in patients who are clinically stable when minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to fluconazole is ≤8 mg/L 16.

Comparison of the characteristics of ICU patients with candidemia caused by non-albicans Candida species versus Candida albicans did not allow identifying any parameter pertinent enough to guide the choice of empirical antifungal therapy.

• Characteristics of patients with candidemia caused by non-albicans Candida species versus Candida albicans are quite similar at the onset of candidemia.

• Empiric antifungal therapy should be based on a broad-spectrum treatment effective against non-albicans Candida species and Candida albicans.

AmarCand: "Analyse du Management en Anesthésie et Réanimation des Candidoses invasives"; C: Candida; CVC: central venous catheter; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; ICU: intensive care unit; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration; SAPS: simplified acute physiology score; SOFA: sepsis-related organ failure assessment; UC: urinary catheter.

OLer has received speaking honoraria from Pfizer, MSD, Astellas, Schering Plough; JPM has received speaking honoraria from Pfizer, MSD, Astellas; PM has received speaking honoraria from Pfizer, MSD, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly; JPG has received speaking honoraria from Pfizer, MSD, Astellas, Schering Plough, Gilead Sciences; and OLor has received speaking honoraria from Pfizer, MSD, Astellas, Schering Plough, and Gilead Sciences.

The research, including the article-processing charge, was funded in full by Merck Sharpe & Dohme-Chibret, France.

OLer contributed to the design of the study and wrote the manuscript. JPM contributed to the design of the study and contributed to the final revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. PM contributed to the design of the study and contributed to the final revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. JPG contributed to the design of the study and contributed to the final revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. OLor contributed to the design of the study and contributed to the final revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.