Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Compassionate use of interventions: results of a European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN) survey of ten European countries.

Kate Whitfield 1, * Karl-Heinz Huemer 2 Diana Winter 3 Steffen Thirstrup 4 Christian Libersa 5 Béatrice Barraud 6 Christine Kubiak 7 Lea Stankovski 7 Xina Grählert 8 Gabriele Dreier 9 Sebastian Geismann 9 Wolfgang Kuchinke 10 Anke Strenge-Hesse 11 Zsuza Temesvari 12 Gyorgy Blasko 13 Gabriella Kardos 13 Timothy O'Brien 14 Margaret Cooney 14 Siobhan Gaynor 14 Arrigo Schieppati 15 Mariantonia Serrano 16 Fernando de Andres 16 Nuria Sanz 17 Raquel Hernández 17 Germán Kreis 17 Charlotte Asker-Hagelberg 18 Hanna Johansson 18 Adeeba Asghar 19 Jean-Marc Husson 20 Jacques Demotes 7 Christian Gluud 1 
Abstract : BACKGROUND: 'Compassionate use' programmes allow medicinal products that are not authorised, but are in the development process, to be made available to patients with a severe disease who have no other satisfactory treatment available to them. We sought to understand how such programmes are regulated in ten European Union countries. METHODS: The European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN) conducted a comprehensive survey on clinical research regulatory requirements, including questions on regulations of 'compassionate use' programmes. Ten European countries, covering approximately 70% of the EU population, were included in the survey (Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the UK). RESULTS: European Regulation 726/2004/EC is clear on the intentions of 'compassionate use' programmes and aimed to harmonise them in the European Union. The survey reveals that different countries have adopted different requirements and that 'compassionate use' is not interpreted in the same way across Europe. Four of the ten countries surveyed have no formal regulatory system for the programmes. We discuss the need for 'compassionate use' programmes and their regulation where protection of patients is paramount. CONCLUSIONS: 'Compassionate use' is a misleading term and should be replaced with 'expanded access'. There is a need for expanded access programmes in order to serve the interests of seriously ill patients who have no other treatment options. To protect these patients, European legislation needs to be more explicit and informative with regard to the regulatory requirements, restrictions, and responsibilities in expanded access programmes.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00663712
Contributor : Ed. BMC Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, January 27, 2012 - 2:13:54 PM
Last modification on : Friday, October 29, 2021 - 9:42:03 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Monday, November 19, 2012 - 3:06:36 PM

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Kate Whitfield, Karl-Heinz Huemer, Diana Winter, Steffen Thirstrup, Christian Libersa, et al.. Compassionate use of interventions: results of a European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN) survey of ten European countries.. Trials, BioMed Central, 2010, 11 (1), pp.104. ⟨10.1186/1745-6215-11-104⟩. ⟨inserm-00663712⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

418

Files downloads

1109