Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

An updated study-level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on proning in ARDS and acute lung injury.

Fekri Abroug 1, * Lamia Ouanes-Besbes 1 Fahmi Dachraoui 1 Islem Ouanes 1 Laurent Brochard 2 
* Corresponding author
2 INSERM U955, équipe 13
Service d'anesthésie-réanimation SAMU94-SMUR94 [Mondor], IMRB - Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale
Abstract : INTRODUCTION: In patients with acute lung injury (ALI) and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) showed a consistent trend of mortality reduction with prone ventilation. We updated a meta-analysis on this topic. METHODS: RCTs that compared ventilation of adult patients with ALI/ARDS in prone versus supine position were included in this study-level meta-analysis. Analysis was made by a random-effects model. The effect size on intensive care unit (ICU) mortality was computed in the overall included studies and in two subgroups of studies: those that included all ALI or hypoxemic patients, and those that restricted inclusion to only ARDS patients. A relationship between studies' effect size and daily prone duration was sought with meta-regression. We also computed the effects of prone positioning on major adverse airway complications. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (including 1,675 adult patients, of whom 862 were ventilated in the prone position) were included. The four most recent trials included only ARDS patients, and also applied the longest proning durations and used lung-protective ventilation. The effects of prone positioning differed according to the type of study. Overall, prone ventilation did not reduce ICU mortality (odds ratio = 0.91, 95% confidence interval = 0.75 to 1.2; P = 0.39), but it significantly reduced the ICU mortality in the four recent studies that enrolled only patients with ARDS (odds ratio = 0.71; 95% confidence interval = 0.5 to 0.99; P = 0.048; number needed to treat = 11). Meta-regression on all studies disclosed only a trend to explain effect variation by prone duration (P = 0.06). Prone positioning was not associated with a statistical increase in major airway complications. CONCLUSIONS: Long duration of ventilation in prone position significantly reduces ICU mortality when only ARDS patients are considered.
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [25 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Ed. BMC Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, January 27, 2012 - 2:09:52 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, October 19, 2021 - 4:09:48 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Monday, November 19, 2012 - 3:05:42 PM


Publisher files allowed on an open archive




Fekri Abroug, Lamia Ouanes-Besbes, Fahmi Dachraoui, Islem Ouanes, Laurent Brochard. An updated study-level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on proning in ARDS and acute lung injury.. Critical Care, BioMed Central, 2011, 15 (1), pp.R6. ⟨10.1186/cc9403⟩. ⟨inserm-00663699⟩



Record views


Files downloads