Benefits of ICU admission in critically ill patients: Whether instrumental variable methods or propensity scores should be used. - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles BMC Medical Research Methodology Year : 2011

Benefits of ICU admission in critically ill patients: Whether instrumental variable methods or propensity scores should be used.

(1, 2) , (3) , (4) , (1)
1
2
3
4

Abstract

UNLABELLED: ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The assessment of the causal effect of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission generally involves usual observational designs and thus requires controlling for confounding variables. Instrumental variable analysis is an econometric technique that allows causal inferences of the effectiveness of some treatments during situations to be made when a randomized trial has not been or cannot be conducted. This technique relies on the existence of one variable or "instrument" that is supposed to achieve similar observations with a different treatment for "arbitrary" reasons, thus inducing substantial variation in the treatment decision with no direct effect on the outcome. The objective of the study was to assess the benefit in terms of hospital mortality of ICU admission in a cohort of patients proposed for ICU admission (ELDICUS cohort). METHODS: Using this cohort of 8,201 patients triaged for ICU (including 6,752 (82.3%) patients admitted), the benefit of ICU admission was evaluated using 3 different approaches: instrumental variables, standard regression and propensity score matched analyses. We further evaluated the results obtained using different instrumental variable methods that have been proposed for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: The physician's main specialization was found to be the best instrument. All instrumental variable models adequately reduced baseline imbalances, but failed to show a significant effect of ICU admission on hospital mortality, with confidence intervals far higher than those obtained in standard or propensity-based analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Instrumental variable methods offer an appealing alternative to handle the selection bias related to nonrandomized designs, especially when the presence of significant unmeasured confounding is suspected. Applied to the ELDICUS database, this analysis failed to show any significant beneficial effect of ICU admission on hospital mortality. This result could be due to the lack of statistical power of these methods.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
1471-2288-11-132.pdf (184.59 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Vignette du fichier
1471-2288-11-132.xml (84.28 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Publisher files allowed on an open archive
Format : Other
Loading...

Dates and versions

inserm-00629633 , version 1 (06-10-2011)

Identifiers

Cite

Romain Pirracchio, Charles Sprung, Didier Payen, Sylvie Chevret. Benefits of ICU admission in critically ill patients: Whether instrumental variable methods or propensity scores should be used.. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011, 11 (1), pp.132. ⟨10.1186/1471-2288-11-132⟩. ⟨inserm-00629633⟩
112 View
151 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More