 |
Journal articles
Quality versus quantity: assessing individual research performance.
Abstract : Evaluating individual research performance is a complex task that ideally examines productivity, scientific impact, and research quality-a task that metrics alone have been unable to achieve. In January 2011, the French Academy of Sciences published a report on current bibliometric (citation metric) methods for evaluating individual researchers, as well as recommendations for the integration of quality assessment. Here, I draw on key issues raised by this report and comment on the suggestions for improving existing research evaluation practices.
https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00608624
Contributor : Katia Marazova Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, July 13, 2011 - 3:46:07 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, May 10, 2022 - 3:47:23 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Friday, October 14, 2011 - 2:41:30 AM
Contributor : Katia Marazova Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, July 13, 2011 - 3:46:07 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, May 10, 2022 - 3:47:23 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Friday, October 14, 2011 - 2:41:30 AM
Files
inserm-00608624_edited.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)
- CmSahel_CE4_fromAUTHOR.pdf Files produced by the author(s)