Quality versus quantity: assessing individual research performance.
Abstract
Evaluating individual research performance is a complex task that ideally examines productivity, scientific impact, and research quality-a task that metrics alone have been unable to achieve. In January 2011, the French Academy of Sciences published a report on current bibliometric (citation metric) methods for evaluating individual researchers, as well as recommendations for the integration of quality assessment. Here, I draw on key issues raised by this report and comment on the suggestions for improving existing research evaluation practices.
Fichier principal
inserm-00608624_edited.pdf (167.65 Ko)
Télécharger le fichier
CmSahel_CE4_fromAUTHOR.pdf (180.44 Ko)
Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)