Post mortem scientific sampling and the search for causes of death in intensive care: what information should be given and what consent should be obtained?

Jean-Philippe Rigaud 1, 2, * Jean-Pierre Quenot 1, 3 Marie Borel 1, 4 Isabelle Plu 1 Christian Hervé 1, 5 Grégoire Moutel 1, 5
* Auteur correspondant
1 LEM - Laboratoire d'éthique médicale et médecine légale
2 Service de Réanimation Polyvalente
3 Service de Réanimation Médicale (CHU de Dijon)
4 Département d'anesthésie-Réanimation-Samu
5 Service d'accès aux soins et de droits des patients
Abstract : PURPOSE: The search for cause of death is important to improve knowledge and provide answers for the relatives of the deceased. Medical autopsy following unexplained death in hospital is one way to identify cause of death but is difficult to carry out routinely. Post mortem sampling (PMS) of tissues via thin biopsy needle or 'mini incisions' in the skin may be a useful alternative. A study was undertaken to assess how this approach is perceived by intensive care doctors and also to evaluate how this practice is considered in ethical terms in France. METHODS: A study of PMS practices immediately after death in 10 intensive care departments was performed. The medical director of each centre was interviewed by telephone and asked to describe practices in their unit and to outline the questions raised by this practice. RESULTS: PMS is routinely performed in 70% of the units which responded, without systematically obtaining formal consent and without precise rules for communicating results. Approaches to PMS differed between centres, but all physicians felt that PMS is useful for the scientific information it gives and also for the information it provides for relatives. All physicians regret the lack of standards to structure PMS practices. CONCLUSION: Information from post mortem examinations is important for society to inform about causes of death, for doctors to improve practices and for decision-makers responsible for organising care. Debate persists regarding the balance between individual rights and community interests. It is suggested that an approach for identifying cause of death could easily be integrated into the relationship between carers and relatives, provided full transparency is maintained.
Keywords : Post mortem sampling autopsy intensive care ethics
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Journal of Medical Ethics, BMJ Publishing Group, 2011, 37 (3), pp.132-6. 〈10.1136/jme.2010.037739〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [27 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger
http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00565252
Contributeur : Nathalie Duchange <>
Soumis le : vendredi 11 février 2011 - 14:19:16
Dernière modification le : mardi 15 mai 2018 - 16:58:02

Fichiers

Rigaud_et_al.pdf
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

Collections

LEM | ETHIQUE | UNIV-PARIS5 | USPC

Citation

Jean-Philippe Rigaud, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Marie Borel, Isabelle Plu, Christian Hervé, et al.. Post mortem scientific sampling and the search for causes of death in intensive care: what information should be given and what consent should be obtained?. Journal of Medical Ethics, BMJ Publishing Group, 2011, 37 (3), pp.132-6. 〈10.1136/jme.2010.037739〉. 〈inserm-00565252〉

Exporter

BibTeX TEI DC DCterms EndNote

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

249

Téléchargements de fichiers

387

Contact

support.ccsd.cnrs.fr
hal.support@ccsd.cnrs.fr
Logo CCSD