X. Fritel and A. Pigné, La controverse sur l'épisiotomie ou faut-il continuer à prévenir les déchirures périnéales ? Paris: Arnette, pp.211-215, 1997.

I. Graham, G. Carroli, C. Davies, and J. Medves, Episiotomy Rates Around the World: An Update, Birth, vol.28, issue.3, pp.219-242, 2005.
DOI : 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02298.x

G. Carroli and J. Belizan, Episiotomy for vaginal birth, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.2000, issue.2, p.81

J. Reynolds, Reducing the frequency of episiotomies through a continuous quality improvement program, Can Med Assoc J, vol.153, pp.275-82, 1995.

N. Leroux and E. Bujold, Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: A randomized, controlled trial, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.194, issue.6, pp.1585-90, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.011

M. Klein, Episiotomy results stand despite lack of compliance, Can Med Assoc J, vol.153, pp.1708-1718, 1995.

D. Fenner, B. Genberg, P. Brahma, L. Marek, and J. Delancey, Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.189, issue.6, pp.1543-1552, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.030

A. Rodriguez, E. Arenas, A. Osorio, O. Mendez, and J. Zuleta, Selective vs routine midline episiotomy for the prevention of third- or fourth-degree lacerations in nulliparous women, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.198, issue.3, pp.285-286, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.11.007

W. Fraser, S. Marcoux, I. Krauss, J. Douglas, C. Goulet et al., Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second, p.17

L. Ray, C. Carayol, M. Zeitlin, J. Breart, G. Goffinet et al., Level of Perinatal Care of the Maternity Unit and Rate of Cesarean in Low-Risk Nulliparas, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.107, issue.6, pp.1269-77, 2006.
DOI : 10.1097/01.AOG.0000218098.70942.a2

R. Cleary, R. Beard, J. Chapple, J. Coles, M. Griffin et al., The standard primipara as a basis for inter-unit comparisons of maternity care, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.294, issue.3, pp.223-232, 1996.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09710.x

A. Read, W. Prendiville, V. Dawes, and F. Stanley, Cesarean section and operative vaginal delivery in low-risk primiparous women, Western Australia., American Journal of Public Health, vol.84, issue.1, pp.37-42, 1994.
DOI : 10.2105/AJPH.84.1.37

X. Fritel, J. Schaal, A. Fauconnier, V. Bertrand, C. Levet et al., Pelvic floor disorders 4 years after first delivery: a comparative study of restrictive versus systematic episiotomy, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.109, issue.2, pp.247-52, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01540.x

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00356856

B. Langer and A. Minetti, Immediate and long term complications of episiotom, J

E. Sheiner, A. Levy, A. Walfisch, M. Hallak, and M. Mazor, Third degree perineal tears in a university medical center where midline episiotomies are not performed, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol.50, issue.4, pp.307-317, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s00404-004-0610-5

H. Aytan, O. Tapisiz, G. Tuncay, F. Avsar, P. Coats et al., Severe perineal lacerations in nulliparous women and episiotomy type, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.121, issue.1, pp.46-50408, 1980.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.10.013

K. Seekorn, The outcomes of midline versus medio-lateral episiotomy, Reprod Health, vol.4, p.10, 2007.

I. Graham and D. Graham, Episiotomy Counts: Trends and Prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994, Birth, vol.24, issue.3, pp.141-148, 1981.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.00141.pp.x

L. Ray, C. Gaudu, S. Teboul, M. Cabrol, D. Goffinet et al., Management of labor and delivery in low risk nulliparous women: comparison between level 1 and level 3

R. Grol and J. Grimshaw, From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care, The Lancet, vol.362, issue.9391, pp.1225-1255, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1

F. Althabe, P. Buekens, E. Bergel, J. Belizan, M. Campbell et al., A behavioral intervention to improve obstetrical care Pudendal nerve damage during labour: prospective study before and after childbirth, N Engl J Med Br J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.358, issue.101, pp.1929-4022, 1994.

J. De-leeuw, M. Vierhout, P. Struijk, H. Auwerda, D. Bac et al., long-term clinical and functional results after primary repair Anal sphincter damage after vaginal delivery: relationship of anal endosonography and manometry to anorectal complaints, Br J Surg Dis Colon Rectum, vol.85, issue.45, pp.1433-81004, 1998.