In the dark The reporting of blinding status in randomized controlled trials, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.55, issue.8, pp.787-90, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00446-8
Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study, BMJ, vol.336, issue.7644, pp.601-606, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.39465.451748.AD
Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what, The Lancet, vol.359, issue.9307, pp.696-700, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07816-9
Methods of Blinding in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Pharmacologic Treatments: A Systematic Review, PLoS Medicine, vol.330, issue.10, p.425, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030425.sd001
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00128342
Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments, PLoS Medicine, vol.330, issue.2, p.61, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040061.st003
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00166560
What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials, BMJ, vol.319, issue.7211, pp.670-674, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670
Inclusion of patients in clinical trial analysis: the intention-to-treat principle, Med J Aust, vol.179, pp.438-478, 2003. ,
Better backs by better beds? Spine, pp.703-711, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181695d3b
Violation of the intent-to-treat principle and rate of missing data in superiority trials assessing structural outcomes in rheumatic diseases, Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol.55, issue.6, pp.1858-65, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1002/art.21116
Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation, JAMA, vol.296, issue.20, pp.2441-50, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.296.20.2441
Design and quality considerations for randomized controlled trials in systemic sclerosis, Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol.354, issue.1, pp.73-81, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1002/art1.10218
Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Ann Intern Med, pp.605-618, 1996. ,
Effect of Fluoride Treatment on the Fracture Rate in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.322, issue.12, pp.802-811, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM199003223221203
Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials, JAMA, vol.291, issue.20, pp.2457-65, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457
Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation, The Lancet, vol.365, issue.9454, pp.176-86, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17709-5
The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect, BMJ, vol.310, issue.6977, pp.452-456, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.310.6977.452
Number needed to treat (NNT): implication in rheumatology clinical practice, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol.62, issue.4, pp.316-337, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1136/ard.62.4.316
An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.318, issue.26, pp.1728-1761, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM198806303182605
The prevalence of underpowered randomized clinical trials in rheumatology, J Rheumatol, vol.32, pp.2083-2091, 2005. ,
In the Era of Systematic Reviews, Does the Size of an Individual Trial Still Matter?, PLoS Medicine, vol.7, issue.1, p.4, 2008. ,
DOI : 0098-7484(2005)294[2203:RTSEFB]2.0.CO;2
Statistics Notes: Units of analysis, BMJ, vol.314, issue.7098, p.1874, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1874
Independence and Statistical Inference in Clinical Trial Designs: A Tutorial Review, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol.23, issue.5, pp.408-420, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04444.x
External validity of randomised controlled trials: ???To whom do the results of this trial apply????, The Lancet, vol.365, issue.9453, pp.82-93, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8