Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

[Why teams in charge of children after a pediatric intensive care unit stay do not take into account the treatment limitation decisions previously made by intensivists].

Abstract : The medical reasoning model that is used for LTDs in the PICU generates conflictual situations when compared to the models that are used in other specialties. These models represent various expressions of subjectivity, as in any medical decision. Acknowledging this fact could facilitate its integration into clinical practice and should improve authentic debates that are necessary to ensure continuity of care for these children.
Complete list of metadatas

https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00414960
Contributor : Nathalie Duchange <>
Submitted on : Thursday, September 10, 2009 - 10:53:03 AM
Last modification on : Saturday, April 25, 2020 - 1:35:01 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Tuesday, June 15, 2010 - 11:26:59 PM

Files

ArchPediatr2009_Texte_d_auteur...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Citation

Robin Cremer, Alexandra Binoche, Grégoire Moutel, Béatrice Fourestié, Astrid Botte, et al.. [Why teams in charge of children after a pediatric intensive care unit stay do not take into account the treatment limitation decisions previously made by intensivists].. Archives de Pédiatrie, Elsevier, 2009, 16 (9), pp.1233-44. ⟨10.1016/j.arcped.2009.05.014⟩. ⟨inserm-00414960⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

590

Files downloads

834