Open to debate. The motion: Robotic partial nephrectomy is better than open partial nephrectomy.

Craig G. Rogers; Jean-Jacques Patard

doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.026

Journal articles

Open to debate. The motion: Robotic partial nephrectomy is better than open partial nephrectomy.

Craig G. Rogers ^{1, *} Jean-Jacques Patard ^{2, 3, *}

* Corresponding author

1 Vattikuti Urology Institute

2 IGDR - Institut de Génétique et Développement de Rennes

3 Service d'urologie [Rennes] = Urology [Rennes]

Document type :

Journal articles

Domain :

Life Sciences [q-bio] / Human health and pathology / Urology and Nephrology

Life Sciences [q-bio] / Human health and pathology / Surgery

Complete list of metadata

https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00406123
Contributor : Hervé De Villemeur Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Tuesday, July 21, 2009 - 2:54:31 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, March 30, 2022 - 2:36:01 PM

Open to debate. The motion: Robotic partial nephrectomy is better than open partial nephrectomy.

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Export

Metrics

45

Open to debate. The motion: Robotic partial nephrectomy is better than open partial nephrectomy.

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Export

Share

Metrics

45