Switching to second-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings: comparison of programmes with and without viral load monitoring. - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles AIDS Year : 2009

Switching to second-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings: comparison of programmes with and without viral load monitoring.

(1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (1)
1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In high-income countries, viral load is routinely measured to detect failure of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and guide switching to second-line ART. Viral load monitoring is not generally available in resource-limited settings. We examined switching from nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based first-line regimens to protease inhibitor-based regimens in Africa, South America and Asia. DESIGN AND METHODS: Multicohort study of 17 ART programmes. All sites monitored CD4 cell count and had access to second-line ART and 10 sites monitored viral load. We compared times to switching, CD4 cell counts at switching and obtained adjusted hazard ratios for switching (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from random-effects Weibull models. RESULTS: A total of 20 113 patients, including 6369 (31.7%) patients from 10 programmes with access to viral load monitoring, were analysed; 576 patients (2.9%) switched. Low CD4 cell counts at ART initiation were associated with switching in all programmes. Median time to switching was 16.3 months [interquartile range (IQR) 10.1-26.6] in programmes with viral load monitoring and 21.8 months (IQR 14.0-21.8) in programmes without viral load monitoring (P < 0.001). Median CD4 cell counts at switching were 161 cells/microl (IQR 77-265) in programmes with viral load monitoring and 102 cells/microl (44-181) in programmes without viral load monitoring (P < 0.001). Switching was more common in programmes with viral load monitoring during months 7-18 after starting ART (aHR 1.38; 95% CI 0.97-1.98), similar during months 19-30 (aHR 0.97; 95% CI 0.58-1.60) and less common during months 31-42 (aHR 0.29; 95% CI 0.11-0.79). CONCLUSION: In resource-limited settings, switching to second-line regimens tends to occur earlier and at higher CD4 cell counts in ART programmes with viral load monitoring compared with programmes without viral load monitoring.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
inserm-00385651_edited.pdf (194.44 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Vignette du fichier
AIDS_in_press.pdf (207.59 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

inserm-00385651 , version 1 (23-09-2010)

Identifiers

Cite

Olivia Keiser, Hannock Tweya, Andrew Boulle, Paula Braitstein, Mauro Schechter, et al.. Switching to second-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings: comparison of programmes with and without viral load monitoring.. AIDS, 2009, 23 (14), pp.1867-74. ⟨10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832e05b2⟩. ⟨inserm-00385651⟩

Collections

INSERM
101 View
572 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More