Thestateofthestent:currentpractices,controversies,andfuturetrends.The Americanjournalofcardiology1996, pp.4-7 ,
Volume-outcome relationships for percutaneous coronary interventions in the stent era, Circulation2005, issue.8, pp.1121171-1179 ,
Methodological Differences in Clinical Trials Evaluating Nonpharmacological and Pharmacological Treatments of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis, JAMA, vol.290, issue.8, pp.2901062-1070, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.290.8.1062
Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintaininnon-pharmacologicalthanpharmacologicaltrials, pp.543-550, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.010
Is the volume-outcome relation still an issue in the era of PCI with systematic stenting?ResultsofthegreaterParisareaPCIregistry, EurHeartJ2006, issue.9, pp.271054-1060 ,
ACC/AHA2002guidelineupdateforthemanagementofpatientswith unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina), J Am Coll Cardiol, issue.7, pp.401366-1374, 2002. ,
WilliamsonPetal:Coronaryarterystents:arapidsystematicreviewandeconomicevaluation, Health TechnolAssess2004, vol.8, issue.35, pp.1-242 ,
External validity of randomised controlled trials: ???To whom do the results of this trial apply????, The Lancet, vol.365, issue.9453, pp.82-93 ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8
VandeWerfF:External validityofclinicaltrialsin acute myocardial infarction.ArchInternMed, pp.68-73, 2007. ,
Achecklisttoevaluatea reportofanonpharmacologicaltrial(CLEARNPT)wasdevelopedusingconsensus, JClinEpidemiol, vol.58, issue.12, pp.1233-1240, 2005. ,
The use of random effects models to allow for clustering in individually randomizedtrials, ClinTrials2005, vol.2, issue.2, pp.163-173 ,
RussellD:Factorsthatlimitthe quality,numberandprogressofrandomised controlledtrials, HealthTechnolAssess1999, vol.3, issue.20, pp.1-143 ,
Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials, JAMA, vol.287, issue.22, pp.2872973-2982, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.287.22.2973
Narrativereview:drug-elutingstentsforthemanagementof restenosis:acriticalappraisaloftheevidence.AnnInternMed2006, pp.913-919 ,
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodologicalqualityassociatedwithestimatesoftreatmenteffectsincontrolledtrials, Jama1995, vol.273, issue.5, pp.408-412 ,
Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials:systematicreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials, Bmj2007, issue.7597, p.334786 ,
Key issues in end point selection for heartfailure trials:compositeendpoints, pp.567-575, 2005. ,
Composite Outcomes in Randomized Trials, JAMA, vol.289, issue.19, pp.2554-2559 ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.289.19.2554
Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology, ACC Current Journal Review, vol.14, issue.8, pp.26804-847, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.accreview.2005.08.063
Relation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronaryinterventionsintheeraofthecoronarystent, pp.2843139-3144, 2000. ,
Operator volume and outcomes of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in a single high-volume centre, Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, vol.7, issue.10, pp.761-767, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.2459/01.JCM.0000247324.95653.ed
Volume - Outcome Relation for Hospitals Performing Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Circulation Journal, vol.68, issue.10, pp.68887-891 ,
DOI : 10.1253/circj.68.887
Operatorvolumeandoutcomeofpatientsundergoingcoronary stentplacement, pp.970-976, 1998. ,
Strategies for Reducing the Door-to-Balloon Time in Acute Myocardial Infarction, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.355, issue.22, pp.2308-2320 ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMsa063117
Relation Between Hospital Specialization With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Clinical Outcomes in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-4 Analysis, Circulation, vol.113, issue.2, pp.222-229 ,
DOI : 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.578195
Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet1998, pp.352609-613 ,