Comparison of echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging and delayed postcontrast T1-weighted MR imaging for the detection of residual cholesteatoma. - Inserm - Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale Access content directly
Journal Articles American Journal of Neuroradiology Year : 2008

Comparison of echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging and delayed postcontrast T1-weighted MR imaging for the detection of residual cholesteatoma.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and delayed postcontrast T1-weighted MR imaging (DPI) have been proposed in previous studies to detect residual middle ear cholesteatomas, with varying results. We assessed and compared these 2 techniques in patients with canal wall-up tympanoplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. Patients who underwent surgery for middle ear cholesteatoma had CT scanning 9 months after the surgery. If opacity was observed (64%) on CT scans, DWI and DPI were performed before second-look surgery. CT, MR imaging, and surgical data were available for 31 patients. Charts were reviewed independently by 3 blinded examiners. Interobserver agreement for MR imaging was calculated (Cohen kappa). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for these techniques: 1) alone or in association, and 2) according to the residual cholesteatoma size measured during surgery. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was better for DWI (kappa = 0.81) than for DPI (kappa = 0.51). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV values were 60%, 72.73%, 80%, and 50%, respectively, with DWI; and 90%, 54.55%, 78.26%, and 75%, respectively, with DPI. With cholesteatomas >5 mm, the sensitivity and specificity of DWI reached 100% and 88%, respectively, with values for DPI reaching 100% and 80%, respectively. The association of both techniques only allowed improvements in the specificity for lesions >5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques gave acceptable results for residual cholesteatoma detection. DWI is more specific but less sensitive than DPI. Their concurrent use may benefit patients by avoiding undue surgery.

Dates and versions

inserm-00349476 , version 1 (31-12-2008)

Identifiers

Cite

Frédéric Venail, Alain Bonafé, V. Poirrier, Michel Mondain, Alain Uziel. Comparison of echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging and delayed postcontrast T1-weighted MR imaging for the detection of residual cholesteatoma.. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2008, 29 (7), pp.1363-8. ⟨10.3174/ajnr.A1100⟩. ⟨inserm-00349476⟩
51 View
0 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More