Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap Test in Clinical Practice, Acta Cytologica, vol.42, issue.1, pp.203-211, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1159/000331547
A multicentric evaluation of liquid based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening (sous presse) ,
Sensitivity of the AutoPap 300 QC System for Cervical Cytologic Abnormalities, Acta Cytologica, vol.40, issue.1, pp.127-159, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1159/000333593
Papillomavirus et cancer du col, Médecine Sciences, vol.6, issue.7, pp.733-777, 1996. ,
Identifying women with cervical neoplasia using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results, JAMA, vol.281, p.1605, 1999. ,
Observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia., BMJ, vol.298, issue.6675, pp.707-717, 1989. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.298.6675.707
Role of HPV testing in secondary screening of cervical neoplasia, CME Journal Gyn Oncol, vol.4, pp.64-72, 2000. ,
Comparative analysis of human papillomavirus detection by hybrid capture assay and routine cytologic screening to detect high-grade cervical lesions, International Journal of Cancer, vol.186, issue.4, pp.525-533, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980209)75:4<525::AID-IJC6>3.0.CO;2-V
Relation of human papilloma virus status to cervical lesions and consequences for cervical-cancer screening: a prospective study, The Lancet, vol.354, issue.9172, pp.20-25, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)12490-X
HPV DNA Testing in Cervical Cancer Screening, JAMA, vol.283, issue.1, pp.87-93, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.283.1.87
The Gothenburg Breast Cancer Screening Trial: Preliminary Results on Breast Cancer Mortality for Women Aged 39-49, JNCI Monographs, vol.1997, issue.22, pp.53-58, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.53
Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system, European Journal of Radiology, vol.31, issue.1, pp.25-34, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0720-048X(99)00066-2
Potential Contribution of Computer-aided Detection to the Sensitivity of Screening Mammography, Radiology, vol.215, issue.2, pp.554-62, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma15554
Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: Contribution of US as an Adjunct to Mammography, Radiology, vol.213, issue.2, pp.413-435, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv05413
Breast MR Imaging Screening in 192 Women Proved or Suspected to Be Carriers of a Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene: Preliminary Results, Radiology, vol.215, issue.1, pp.267-79, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap01267
Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer, The Lancet, vol.348, issue.9040, pp.1472-1479, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03386-7
Prevention of Colorectal Cancer by Colonoscopic Polypectomy, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.329, issue.27, pp.1977-81, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701
Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screening, Gut, vol.44, issue.3, pp.301-306, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1136/gut.44.3.301
Colorectal neoplasm detection using virtual colonoscopy, European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol.11, issue.2, pp.806-817, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00042737-199902000-00026
Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality, Am J Roentgenol, vol.162, p.104, 1994. ,
First International Symposium on Virtual Colonoscopy., American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.173, issue.3, pp.565-574, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.173.3.10470880
Comparison of Time-Efficient CT Colonography with Two-and Three-Dimensional Colonic Evaluation for Detecting Colorectal Polyps, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.174, issue.6, pp.1543-1552, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741543
Optimization of CT Colonography Technique: Prospective Trial in 180 Patients, Radiology, vol.216, issue.3, pp.704-715, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00au41704
CT colonography: potential pitfalls and problem-solving techniques., American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.172, issue.5, pp.1271-1279, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.172.5.10227501
Detection of persistent vegetative bacteria and amplified viral nucleic acid from in-use testing of gastrointestinal endoscopes, Journal of Hospital Infection, vol.39, issue.2, pp.149-57, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0195-6701(98)90329-2
Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies, Gastroenterology, vol.112, issue.1, pp.24-32, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0016-5085(97)70214-2
Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy., American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.172, issue.4, pp.913-921, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.172.4.10587120
CT Colonography: The Next Colon Screening Examination?, Radiology, vol.216, issue.2, pp.331-372, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.216.2.r00au47331
Colonic Masses: Detection with MR Colonography, Radiology, vol.216, issue.2, pp.383-391, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.216.2.r00au11383