Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials, Health Technol Assess, vol.3, pp.1-143, 1999. ,
Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals, The Lancet, vol.365, issue.9465, pp.1159-1162, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71879-1
Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions, BMJ, vol.324, issue.7351, pp.1448-1451, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1448
Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health, BMJ, vol.321, issue.7262, pp.694-696, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694
The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.134, issue.8, pp.663-694, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012
Mortality rates after surgery for congenital heart defects in children and surgeons' performance, The Lancet, vol.355, issue.9208, pp.1004-1007, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)90001-1
Interpretation of operative risks of individual surgeons, The Lancet, vol.353, issue.9161, p.1325, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01000-4
Methodologic Issues in Randomized Controlled Trials of Surgical Interventions, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol.413, pp.25-32, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.blo.0000080539.81794.54
Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials, BMJ, vol.330, issue.7482, p.88, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.330.7482.88
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC543877
Relation Between Operator and Hospital Volume and Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the Era of the Coronary Stent, JAMA, vol.284, issue.24, pp.3139-3144, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.284.24.3139
Volume of procedures and outcome of treatment, BMJ, vol.325, issue.7368, pp.787-788, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.325.7368.787
Does it matter what a hospital is "high volume" for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data, BMJ, vol.328, issue.7442, pp.379-383, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.38030.642963.AE
Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures, British Journal of Surgery, vol.52, issue.4, pp.389-402, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1002/bjs.4954
APPLICATION OF THE CONSOLIDATED STANDARDS OF REPORTING TRIALS (CONSORT) IN THE FRACTURE CARE LITERATURE, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, vol.84, issue.3, pp.485-489, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.2106/00004623-200203000-00023
Analysis of quality of interventions in systematic reviews, BMJ, vol.331, issue.7515, pp.507-509, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.331.7515.507
A review of blinding in randomized controlled trials found results inconsistent and questionable, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.58, issue.12, pp.1220-1226, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.04.006
Clinical trials in general surgical journals: Are methods better reported?, Surgery, vol.125, issue.1, pp.41-45, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70286-2
Surgery and the randomised controlled trial: past, present and future, Med J Aust, vol.169, pp.380-383, 1998. ,
Randomized controlled trials in surgery, Surgery, vol.115, pp.707-712, 1994. ,
Surgery on trial: An account of clinical trials evaluating operations, Surgery, vol.124, issue.1, pp.22-27, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0039-6060(98)70070-4
Medical and Surgical Comanagement after Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.141, issue.1, pp.28-38, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-141-1-200407060-00012
Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol.35, issue.5, pp.1048-1060, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1067/mva.2002.123763
Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.137, issue.6, pp.511-520, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-137-6-200209170-00012
Variations in Morbidity after Radical Prostatectomy, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.346, issue.15, pp.1138-1144, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMsa011788
The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer, British Journal of Surgery, vol.24, issue.8, pp.1008-1013, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02151.x
Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol.195, issue.6, pp.814-821, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01345-5
Hospital Volume Can Serve as a Surrogate for Surgeon Volume for Achieving Excellent Outcomes in Colorectal Resection, Annals of Surgery, vol.230, issue.3, pp.404-411, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00013
Assessing operative skill, BMJ, vol.318, issue.7188, pp.887-888, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.887
URL : http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/318/7188/887
Skills assessment of surgeons, Surgery, vol.131, issue.2, pp.121-124, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1067/msy.2002.115831
Assessment of surgical competence, Quality and Safety in Health Care, vol.10, issue.Supplement 2, pp.64-69, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1136/qhc.0100064
The challenge of objective assessment of surgical skill, The American Journal of Surgery, vol.181, issue.6, pp.484-486, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00624-9
The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Southern Surgeons Club, Am J Surg, vol.170, pp.55-59, 1995. ,
Surgical evaluation, British Journal of Surgery, vol.83, issue.9, pp.1390-1392, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1002/bjs.1800810950
Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients, The Lancet, vol.345, issue.8952, pp.745-748, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90637-1
Trials in surgery, British Journal of Surgery, vol.91, issue.1, pp.6-16, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1002/bjs.4418
Methodological Differences in Clinical Trials Evaluating Nonpharmacological and Pharmacological Treatments of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis, JAMA, vol.290, issue.8, pp.1062-1070, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.290.8.1062
Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintain in nonpharmacologic than pharmacologic trials, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.57, issue.6, pp.543-550, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.010
THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, vol.84, issue.3, pp.388-396, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.2106/00004623-200203000-00009
How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study, Health Technol Assess, vol.7, pp.1-76, 2003. ,
Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials, JAMA, vol.285, issue.15, pp.1992-1995, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.285.15.1992
The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist, Controlled Clinical Trials, vol.23, issue.4, pp.380-388, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0197-2456(02)00214-3
CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials, BMJ, vol.328, issue.7441, pp.702-708, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.702
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC381234
Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.141, issue.10, pp.781-788, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00009
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials evaluating herbal interventions: an extension of the CONSORT Statement ,
An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.57, issue.12, pp.1232-1236, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.017
Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study, BMJ, vol.330, issue.7499, p.1049, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.38414.422650.8F