, DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement, Lancet, vol.1, pp.307-317, 1986.
, Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading, The Lancet, vol.346, issue.8982, pp.1085-1092, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91748-9
, Measuring agreement in method comparison studies, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, vol.8, issue.2, pp.135-60, 1999.
DOI : 10.1191/096228099673819272
, Predictive Performance of Renal Function Equations for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Normal Serum Creatinine Levels, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol.13, issue.8, pp.2140-2144, 2002.
DOI : 10.1097/01.ASN.0000022011.35035.F3
, A Simple Method for the Determination of Glomerular Filtration Rate, Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, vol.161, issue.3
DOI : 10.3109/00365517209084290
, Reliability of routine clearance methods for assessment of glomerular filtration rate in advanced renal insufficiency, Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, vol.38, issue.1, pp.91-97, 1981.
DOI : 10.3109/00365518109092020
, N: Glomerular filtration rate measurement in man by the single injection methods using 51Cr-EDTA Clin, Science, vol.37, pp.169-180, 1969.
, MH: Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine
, Calibration and random variation of the serum creatinine assay as critical elements of using equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol.39, issue.5, pp.920-929, 2002.
DOI : 10.1053/ajkd.2002.32765
, Estimating the Prevalence of Low Glomerular Filtration Rate Requires Attention to the Creatinine Assay Calibration, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol.13, issue.11, pp.2811-2813, 2002.
DOI : 10.1097/01.ASN.0000037420.89149.C9