M. Spearing, R. Post, G. Leverich, D. Brandt, and W. Nolen, Modification of the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale for use in bipolar illness (BP): the CGI-BP, Psychiatry Research, vol.73, issue.3, pp.159-171, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0165-1781(97)00123-6

A. Leon, K. Shear, G. Klerman, L. Portera, J. Rosenbaum et al., A comparison of Symptom Determinants of patient and clinical global ratings in patients with panic disorder and depression, J Clin Psychopharmacol, vol.13, pp.327-331, 1993.

J. Haro, S. Kamath, S. Ochoa, D. Novick, K. Rele et al., on behalf of the SOHO Study Group: The global impression-schizophrenia scale: a simple instrument to measure the diversity of symptoms present in schizophrenia, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, pp.10716-10739, 2003.

P. Bech, Rating scales for affective disorders: their validity and consistency, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, vol.295, pp.11-93, 1981.

Y. Lecrubier, Avantages et limites de la quantification des symptômes dépressifs, Séminaire de Psychiatrie Biologique, 1996.

J. Guelfi, Clinical research in psychopharmacology: new standards for drug development. An application to antidepressants, Psychiatrie et Psychobiologie, vol.5, pp.289-294, 1990.

R. Prien and J. Levine, Research and methodological issues for evaluating the thérapeutic effectiveness of antidepressant drugs, Psychopharmacol Bulletin, vol.20, pp.250-257, 1984.

D. Cicchetti and B. Prusoff, Reliability of Depression and Associated Clinical Symptoms, Archives of General Psychiatry, vol.40, issue.9, pp.987-990, 1983.
DOI : 10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790080069009

J. Jones and D. Hunter, Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research, BMJ, vol.311, issue.7001, pp.376-380, 1995.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376

B. Graham, G. Regehr, and J. Wright, Delphi as a method to establish consensus for diagnostic criteria, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.56, issue.12, pp.1150-1156, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00211-7

A. Fink, J. Losecoff, M. Chassin, and R. Brook, Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use., American Journal of Public Health, vol.74, issue.9, pp.376-380, 1984.
DOI : 10.2105/AJPH.74.9.979

G. Miller, The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information., Psychological Review, vol.63, issue.2, pp.81-97, 1956.
DOI : 10.1037/h0043158

C. Preston and A. Colman, Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences, Acta Psychologica, vol.104, issue.1, pp.1-15, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5

E. Cox, The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: a review, Journal of marketing research, vol.15, pp.261-257, 1980.

E. Minkowsky, Le temps vécu. Quadriges / presses universitaire de France edition, 1995.

F. Buytendijk, Phénoménologie de la rencontre. Textes et études philosophiques Desclée de Brouwer edition, 1952.

H. Tellenbach and . Goût, Psychiatrie ouverte Presse Universitaire de France edition, 1968.

M. Gupta, The Impact of "Phenomenology" on North American Psychiatric Assessment, Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, vol.9, issue.1, pp.73-85, 2002.
DOI : 10.1353/ppp.2003.0009

P. Shrout and J. Fleiss, Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability., Psychological Bulletin, vol.86, issue.2, pp.420-428, 1979.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420

D. Streiner and G. Norman, Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use, Oxford, 1994.

G. Norman, P. Stradford, and G. Regehr, Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.50, issue.8, pp.869-879, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00097-8

D. Cicchetti and S. Sparrow, Developing criteria for establishing the interrater reliability of specific item in a given inventory: Applications to the assessment of adaptive behavior, Am J Ment Defic, vol.86, pp.127-137, 1981.

J. Fermanian, The degree of concordance between observers. The quantitative case. Revue d'épidémiologie et de santé publique, pp.408-413, 1984.

A. Schene, M. Koeter, and B. Wijngaarden, Methodology of a multi-site reliability study: EPSILON Study 3, The British Journal of Psychiatry, vol.177, issue.39, pp.15-20, 2000.
DOI : 10.1192/bjp.177.39.s15