S. Sözen, S. Eskicorabci, and H. Özen, Urinary markers for urothelial cancer, BJU International, vol.34, issue.6, pp.531-533, 2003.
DOI : 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04427.x

A. Saad, D. Hanbury, T. Mcnicholas, G. Boustead, and A. Woodman, The Early Detection and Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer: A Critical Review of the Options, European Urology, vol.39, issue.6, pp.619-633, 2001.
DOI : 10.1159/000052519

S. Bastacky, S. Ibrahim, S. Wilczinski, and W. Murphy, The accuracy of urinary cytology in daily practice, Cancer, vol.158, issue.3, pp.118-128, 1999.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990625)87:3<118::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-N

A. Pondo, B. Cobbs, and P. Gupta, Use of Thinprep in urine cytology (Abstract), Acta Cytol, vol.37, p.584, 1992.

J. Papillo and D. Lapen, Cell yield. Thinprep vs. cytocentrifuge, Acta Cytol, vol.38, pp.33-36, 1992.

I. Anagnostopoulou, H. Spathi, R. Rammou-kinnia, P. Karakitsos, I. Gianni et al., Comparative study of Thinprep and conventional voided urine cytology (Abstract), Cytopathology, vol.11, p.373, 2000.

R. Wright and J. Halford, Evaluation of thin-layer methods in urine cytology, Cytopathology, vol.36, issue.5, pp.306-313, 2001.
DOI : 10.1136/jcp.53.9.718

J. Mouriquand, Differential Nucleolar Staining Affinity with a Modified Papanicolaou Staining Procedure, Stain Technology, vol.5, issue.4, pp.215-219, 1981.
DOI : 10.3109/10520298109067314

W. Murphy, Current status of urinary cytology in the evaluation of bladder neoplasms, Human Pathology, vol.21, issue.9, pp.886-896, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0046-8177(90)90171-Z

L. Layfield, T. Elsheikh, A. Fili, R. Nayar, and V. Shidham, Review of the state of the art and recommendations of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology for urinary cytology procedures and reporting : The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Practice Guidelines Task Force, Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol.287, issue.1, pp.24-30, 2004.
DOI : 10.1002/dc.10401

D. Barrett and E. King, Comparison of cellular recovery rates and morphologic detail obtained using membrane filter and cytocentrifuge techniques, Acta Cytol, vol.20, pp.174-180, 1976.

S. Marwah, D. Devlin, and A. Dekker, A comparative cytologic study of 100 urine specimens processed by the slide centrifuge and membrane filter technique, Acta Cytol, vol.22, pp.431-434, 1978.

E. Piaton, J. Faÿnel, M. Ranchin, and K. Hutin, Comparative study of conventional techniques and liquid-based processing of urine samples for the evaluation of bladder neoplasms (Abstract)

D. Beech, A. Allbee, P. Atanasoff, C. Brahm, T. Moore et al., A comparison of voided urine samples processed by the Cytyc Thinprep processor and the Shandon Cytospin II (Abstract)

J. Goellner, A. Plagge, S. Germain, K. Johnson, D. Mcclain et al., Cytyc Thinprep processor vs. polycarbonate membrane filtration: a comparative study in urine cytology (Abstract), Acta Cytol, vol.37, p.800, 1993.

H. Nassar, R. Ali-fehmi, and S. Madan, Use of ThinPrep?? monolayer technique and cytospin preparation in urine cytology: A comparative analysis, Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol.12, issue.3, pp.115-118, 2003.
DOI : 10.1002/dc.10245

C. Albright and J. Frost, Centrifugal separation of carcinoma or atypical cells in voided urine, Virchows Archiv B Cell Pathology Including Molecular Pathology, vol.74, issue.1, pp.45-53, 1992.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02899664

I. Zardawi and J. Duncan, Evaluation of a Centrifuge Method and Thin-Layer Preparation in Urine Cytology, Acta Cytologica, vol.47, issue.6, pp.1038-1042, 2003.
DOI : 10.1159/000326642

E. Piaton, K. Hutin, J. Faÿnel, M. Ranchin, and M. Cottier, Cost efficiency analysis of modern cytocentrifugation methods versus liquid based (Cytyc Thinprep(R)) processing of urinary samples, Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol.57, issue.11, pp.1208-1212, 2004.
DOI : 10.1136/jcp.2004.018648

P. Tisserand, C. Fouquet, V. Marck, C. Mallard, M. Fabre et al., Thinprep-processed fine-needle samples of breast are effective material for RNA-and DNA-based molecular diagnosis . Application to p53 mutation analysis, Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol, vol.99, pp.223-232, 2003.