[Bibliometric indicators realities, myth and prospective] - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles médecine/sciences Year : 2004

[Bibliometric indicators realities, myth and prospective]

(1) , (1) , (1) , (1) , (2)
1
2

Abstract

The impact factor of scientific reviews, calculated by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), is increasingly used to evaluate the performance of scientists and programmes. Bibliometric indicators, originally designed for other purposes than individual evaluation, are very useful tools provided their interpretation is not extrapolated beyond their limits of validity. Here we present a critical analysis of appropriate uses and misuses of bibliometric data based on case studies. We also outline anticipated consequences of new information technologies, such as electronic journals or open access schemes, on the mode of science production, evaluation and dissemination in biomedical sciences.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Baudouin_2004Med_Sci_Tableaux.pdf (47.16 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Vignette du fichier
Baudouin_2004Med_Sci.pdf (169.46 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Vignette du fichier
Baudouin_2004Med_Sci_Figures_legendes.pdf (112.06 Ko) Télécharger le fichier

Dates and versions

inserm-00000019 , version 1 (24-02-2006)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : inserm-00000019 , version 1
  • PUBMED : 15461970

Cite

Lesya Baudoin, Nicole Haeffner-Cavaillon, Nicole Pinhas, Suzy Mouchet, Claude Kordon. [Bibliometric indicators realities, myth and prospective]. médecine/sciences, 2004, 20, pp.909-15. ⟨inserm-00000019⟩
173 View
333 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More