434 articles – 313 Notices  [english version]
Fiche concise
Incremental predictive value of adding past blood pressure measurements to the Framingham hypertension risk equation: the Whitehall II Study.
Kivimäki M., Tabak A. G., Batty G. D., Ferrie J. E., Nabi H., Marmot M. G., Witte D. R., Singh-Manoux A., Shipley M. J.
Hypertension 55, 4 (2010) 1058-62 - http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00468705
 (20157053) 
Incremental predictive value of adding past blood pressure measurements to the Framingham hypertension risk equation: the Whitehall II Study.
Mika Kivimäki () 1, 2, Adam Tabak2, 3, G David Batty4, Jane Ferrie2, Hermann Nabi5, Michael Marmot2, Daniel Witte6, Archana Singh-Manoux2, 5, Martin Shipley2
1 :  Unit of Excellence for Psychosocial Factors
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
Lemminkäisenkatu 14-18 B, FI-20520 Turku
Finlande
2 :  Department of Epidemiology and Public Health
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/epidemiology/staff/singh-manoux.htm
University College of London (UCL)
1-19 Torrington Place London WC1E 6BT
Royaume-Uni
3 :  1st Department of Medicine
Semmelweis University Faculty of Medicine
Hongrie
4 :  MRC Social & Public Health Sciences Unit
University of Glasgow
Glasgow
Royaume-Uni
5 :  Santé publique et épidémiologie des déterminants professionnels et sociaux de la santé
http://www.u687.idf.inserm.fr/
INSERM : U687 – IFR69 – Université Paris XI - Paris Sud – Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines
Hôpital Paul Brousse 16, av Paul Vaillant Couturier 94807 VILLEJUIF
France
6 :  Steno Diabetes Center
University of Copenhagen
A/S Niels Steensens Vej 2 DK-2820 Gentofte
Danemark
Records of repeated examinations of blood pressure are increasingly available for primary care patients, but the use of this information in predicting incident hypertension remains unclear, because cohort studies with repeat blood pressure monitoring are rare. We compared the incremental value of using data on blood pressure history to a single measure as in the Framingham hypertension risk score, a validated hypertension risk prediction algorithm. Participants were 4314 London-based civil servants (1297 women) aged 35 to 68 years who were free from prevalent hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and coronary heart disease at baseline examination (the Whitehall II Study). Standard clinical examinations of blood pressure, weight and height, current cigarette smoking, and parental history of hypertension were undertaken on a 5-year basis. A total of 1052 incident (new-onset) cases of hypertension were observed in two 5-year baseline follow-up data cycles. Comparison of the Framingham risk score with a score additionally incorporating 5-year blood pressure history showed, at best, modest improvements in indicators of predictive performance: C statistics (0.796 versus 0.799), predicted:observed ratios (1.04 [95% CI: 0.95 to 1.15] versus 0.98 [95% CI: 0.89 to 1.08]), or Hosmer-Lemeshow chi(2) values (11.5 versus 6.5). The net reclassification improvement with the modified score was 9.3% (95% CI: 4.2% to 14.4%), resulting from a net 17.1% increase in nonhypertensives correctly identified as being at lower risk but a net 7.8% increase in hypertensives incorrectly identified as at lower risk. These data suggest that, despite the net reclassification improvement, the clinical use of adding repeat measures of blood pressure to the Framingham hypertension risk score may be limited.
Sciences du Vivant/Santé publique et épidémiologie
Anglais
0194-911X

Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.144220
Hypertension (Hypertension)
Publisher American Heart Association
ISSN 0194-911X (eISSN : 1524-4563)
internationale
04/2010
15/02/2010
55
4
1058-62

Liste des fichiers attachés à ce document : 
DOC
Kivimaki_et_al._Hypertension.doc(129.5 KB)
PDF
Kivimaki_et_al._Hypertension.pdf(149.8 KB)