434 articles – 313 references  [version française]
Short view
Differential dietary nutrient intake according to hormone replacement therapy use: an underestimated confounding factor in epidemiologic studies?
Vercambre M.-N., Fournier A., Boutron-Ruault M.-C., Clavel-Chapelon F., Ringa V., Berr C.
American Journal of Epidemiology 166, 12 (2007) 1451-60 - http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00170064
(17698505)
Differential dietary nutrient intake according to hormone replacement therapy use: an underestimated confounding factor in epidemiologic studies?
Marie-Noël Vercambre () 1, 2, Agnès Fournier1, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault1, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon1, Virginie Ringa3, Claudine Berr2
1:  E3N - Nutrition, hormones et cancer: épidémiologie et prévention
http://www.idf.inserm.fr/site/eri20/
INSERM : ERI20 – IFR69 – Université Paris XI - Paris Sud : EA4045
Institut Gustave-Roussy 39 rue Camille Desmoulins 94805 Villejuif CEDEX
France
2:  Pathologies du système nerveux : recherche épidémiologique et clinique
http://ns3498.ovh.net/~montp/fr/p_o/fr_accueil_nouveau.php
INSERM : U888 – IFR76 – Université Montpellier I
Hôpital la colombiere 39, avenue charles flahault BP 34493 -pav 42 calixte cavalier 34093 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5
France
3:  Santé reproductive, sexualité, infection à VIH - épidémiologie, démographie, sciences sociales
INSERM : U822 – INED – Université Paris XI - Paris Sud
CHU de bicetre 82, rue du general leclerc secteur bleu - porte 26 94276 Le Kremlin Bicêtre
France
Observational studies and randomized controlled trials have produced divergent results concerning the effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on cardiovascular disease and, to a lesser extent, dementia. Residual confounding (confounding that remains even after adjustment for various socioeconomic and lifestyle factors) is one explanation that has been offered for these divergent results. The authors used data collected between 1990 and 1995 from 6,697 French women aged 61-72 years participating in a prospective cohort study to explore the hypothesis that nutritional intake varies according to HRT use and thus may be a source of residual confounding. After the authors adjusted for health and lifestyle factors, HRT users, compared with never users, had significantly higher intakes of alcohol; omega3 fatty acids; vitamins B6, B12, and D; and phosphorus and a lower intake of starch. These differential nutrient intakes were related to differences in eating habits. In particular, HRT users in the studied sample, compared with nonusers, ate significantly more fish. Most of the dietary differences were seen in both early users and delayers of HRT. To limit residual confounding in observational studies, dietary factors may be important parameters to be taken into account in analyses of HRT use and health outcomes.
Life Sciences/Health Care Sciences and Epidemiology
Life Sciences/Food and Nutrition
Life Sciences/Human health and pathology/Endocrinology & Metabolism
Life Sciences/Reproductive Biology
English
1476-6256

Article in peer-reviewed journal
10.1093/aje/kwm162
American Journal of Epidemiology (Am J Epidemiol)
Publisher Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy B
ISSN 0002-9262 (eISSN : 1476-6256)
international
2007-12-15
2007-08-13
166
12
1451-60

bias (epidemiology) – cohort studies – confounding factors (epidemiology) – diet – hormone replacement therapy – nutritional status – observation studies – randomized controlled trials
Attached file list to this document: 
DOC
VercambreAmJEpid.doc(1.9 MB)
PDF
VercambreAmJEpid.pdf(231.3 KB)