434 articles – 313 references  [version française]
Short view
Women's interpretation of an abnormal result on measurement of fetal nuchal translucency and maternal serum screening for prenatal testing of Down syndrome.
Khoshnood B., De Vigan C., Blondel B., Lhomme A., Vodovar V., Garel M., Goffinet F.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28, 3 (2006) 242-8 - http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00128694
(16909402)
Women's interpretation of an abnormal result on measurement of fetal nuchal translucency and maternal serum screening for prenatal testing of Down syndrome.
Babak Khoshnood () 1, Catherine De Vigan1, Béatrice Blondel1, Anne Lhomme1, Véronique Vodovar1, Micheline Garel1, François Goffinet1
1:  Recherches épidémiologiques en santé périnatale et santé des femmes
http://ifr69.vjf.inserm.fr
INSERM : IFR69 – Université Pierre et Marie Curie [UPMC] - Paris VI
Centre de Recherche Inserm 16, Avenue Paul Vaillant-Couturier 94807 VILLEJUIF CEDEX
France
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of sociodemographic and health-provider factors on women's understanding of abnormal results on measurement of nuchal translucency (NT) and maternal serum screening (MSS), 18 months after the implementation of a policy aimed at increasing women's awareness regarding MSS. METHODS: A representative sample of women (n = 734) who gave birth in Parisian maternity units in 1999 were asked about their understanding of an abnormal result on MSS and NT. We assessed the effects of sociodemographic and health-provider factors on the probability of women interpreting an abnormal result correctly, misinterpreting it as a definitive diagnosis, or declaring that they did not know how to interpret the result. Response rate was 92% and the analyses included multinomial models. RESULTS: For both MSS and NT measurement, the majority of women interpreted an abnormal result correctly. However, there were substantial sociodemographic differences in the probability of women interpreting an abnormal result correctly, and more so in the probability of their declaring not to know how to interpret the result. The probability of correct interpretations was substantially higher, and that of declaring not to know how to interpret the result substantially lower, for MSS than NT measurement. However, for several sociodemographic groups, the proportion of women who misinterpreted an abnormal result on screening as indicative of a definitive diagnosis was also higher for MSS as compared with NT measurement. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the need for additional efforts, along with alternative strategies, to inform women about the implications of prenatal screening, particularly in the case of measurement of NT.
Life Sciences/Health Care Sciences and Epidemiology
English
0960-7692

Article in peer-reviewed journal
10.1002/uog.2845
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
2006-09
28
3
242-8

prenatal diagnosis – nuchal translucency – Down syndrome – Trisomy 21 – Congenital Malformations
Support by the INSERM, CNRS, and MIRE-DREES program of Biomedical sciences, Health and Society (SHS-2002) is gratefully acknowledged. Babak Khoshnood also received funding from a grant by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM).