194 articles – 65 references  [version française]
Short view
Can a single-item measure assess physical load at work? An analysis from the GAZEL cohort.
Sabbath E. L., Goldberg M., Wu Q., Descatha A.
J Occup Environ Med 54, 5 (2012) 598-603 - http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00720693
(22481211)
Can a single-item measure assess physical load at work? An analysis from the GAZEL cohort.
Erika Sabbath1, 2, Marcel Goldberg2, Qiong Wu3, Alexis Descatha () 2
1:  Department of Society, Human Development and Health
Harvard School of Public Health
677 Huntington Avenue * Boston, MA 02115
United States
2:  CESP - Centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations
INSERM : U1018 – Université Paris XI - Paris Sud – Hôpital Paul Brousse – Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)
16 avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier 94807 Villejuif Cedex, France
France
3:  Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies
Harvard School of Public (HSP)
9 Bow Street Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Validity of a work-related physical strain measure
OBJECTIVE: The assessment of workplace physical load is highly resource intensive. This study tested whether a single-item measure asking individuals about perceived physical strain (PPS) at work was an acceptable proxy for physical load. METHODS: The study was conducted in a subset of the GAZEL cohort (n = 2612) undergoing assessment of exposure to 38 occupational biomechanical constraints (representing eight domains) in 1994. Test-retest reliability analyses compared PPS in 1994 and 1995. Validity analyses compared PPS in 1994 to concurrent strains assessed in the more extensive measure. RESULTS: The measure showed adequate test-retest reliability. Within and across domains of physical load, linear relationships (P < 0.0001) existed between n exposures and PPS. Domains considered more strenuous (carrying loads, pulling objects) showed the highest PPS. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived physical strain approximates physical load in the absence of detailed measures. Perceived physical strain could be used in nonoccupational epidemiologic studies.
Life Sciences/Health Care Sciences and Epidemiology
English
1536-5948

Article in peer-reviewed journal
10.1097/JOM.0b013e31824af5a8
J Occup Environ Med
international
2012-05
54
5
598-603

The GAZEL Cohort Study was funded by EDF-GDF and INSERM and received grants from the "Cohortes Santé TGIR Program‟, Agence nationale de la recherché (ANR) and Agence française de sécurité sanitaire de l‟environnement et du travail (AFSSET).
Attached file list to this document: 
DOC
sabbath_et_al._J_Occup_Environ_Med_2012.doc(242 KB)
PDF
sabbath_et_al._J_Occup_Environ_Med_2012.pdf(432.1 KB)