Treatment of severe hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review of inclusion and judgment criteria used in randomized controlled trials

Abstract : AbstractBackgroundHospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP) are often selected for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) aiming at new drug approval. Guidelines for the design of such RCTs have been repeatedly updated by regulatory agencies. We hypothesized that large variability in the enrolled populations, the endpoints assessed and the HAP/VAP definition criteria may impact the results of these studies, and addressed this through a systematic review of HAP/VAP RCTs.MethodsA search (Pubmed-Embase-ICAAC-ECCMID) of all RCTs published between 1994 and 2016 comparing antimicrobial treatment for HAP/VAP in the intensive care unit was conducted. The populations enrolled, inclusion/exclusion criteria, statistical design and endpoints assessed were recorded. All unpublished RCTs recorded on the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were also screened.ResultsFrom the 93 abstracts reviewed, 39 potentially relevant studies were inspected, leading to 27 studies being included. As expected, illness severity or the proportion with VAP (27–100%) differed greatly among the enrolled populations. The HAP/VAP definition used various clinical and biological criteria, and only 55% of studies required a microbiological sample. The mandatory duration of prior hospital stay was variable; the mechanical ventilation duration was an inclusion criterion in only 41% of VAP studies. Nine studies had non-inferiority design, but nine studies (33%) did not have a pre-specified statistical hypothesis. Clinical cure was the primary endpoint in 24 studies, but was recorded in several populations or as the co-primary endpoint in 13 studies. The definition of clinical cure and the timing of its assessment greatly differed. This variability slightly improved over time but remained significant in the 13 registered but currently unpublished RCTs that we screened.ConclusionOur study provides a description of populations and endpoints of RCTs evaluating antimicrobials for treatment of HAP/VAP in the ICU. There was significant heterogeneity in enrollment criteria, endpoints and statistical design, which may influence the ability of studies to demonstrate differences between studied drugs.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Critical Care, BioMed Central, 2016, 21 (1), pp.162. 〈10.1186/s13054-017-1755-5〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-01552315
Contributeur : Bmc Bmc <>
Soumis le : dimanche 2 juillet 2017 - 05:18:12
Dernière modification le : mardi 23 janvier 2018 - 11:58:37
Document(s) archivé(s) le : jeudi 14 décembre 2017 - 19:22:43

Fichiers

13054_2017_Article_1755.pdf
Publication financée par une institution

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Emmanuel Weiss, Wafa Essaied, Christophe Adrie, Jean-Ralph Zahar, Jean-François Timsit. Treatment of severe hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review of inclusion and judgment criteria used in randomized controlled trials. Critical Care, BioMed Central, 2016, 21 (1), pp.162. 〈10.1186/s13054-017-1755-5〉. 〈inserm-01552315〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

179

Téléchargements de fichiers

135