Statistical controversies in clinical research: prognostic gene signatures are not (yet) useful in clinical practice

Stefan Michiels 1, 2, 3, * Nils Ternès 4, 2, 3 Federico Rotolo 2, 3, 4
* Auteur correspondant
1 SBE - Service de biostatistique et d'épidémiologie
Direction de la recherche clinique [Gustave Roussy]
4 U1018 (Équipe 2) - Méthodologie et épidémiologie clinique en oncologie moléculaire
CESP - Centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations, IGR - Institut Gustave Roussy
Abstract : With the genomic revolution and the era of targeted therapy, prognostic and predictive gene signatures are becoming increasingly important in clinical research. They are expected to assist prognosis assessment and therapeutic decision making. Notwithstanding, an evidence-based approach is needed to bring gene signatures from the laboratory to clinical practice. In early breast cancer, multiple prognostic gene signatures are commercially available without having formally reached the highest levels of evidence-based criteria. We discuss specific concepts for developing and validating a prognostic signature and illustrate them with contemporary examples in breast cancer. When a prognostic signature has not been developed for predicting the magnitude of relative treatment benefit through an interaction effect, it may be wishful thinking to test its predictive value. We propose that new gene signatures be built specifically for predicting treatment effects for future patients and outline an approach for this using a cross-validation scheme in a standard phase III trial. Replication in an independent trial remains essential.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Annals of Oncology, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2016, 27 (12), pp.2160 - 2167. 〈10.1093/annonc/mdw307〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [61 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger

http://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-01498783
Contributeur : Stefan Michiels <>
Soumis le : jeudi 30 mars 2017 - 15:54:50
Dernière modification le : jeudi 13 juillet 2017 - 11:39:15

Fichier

mdw307.pdf
Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte

Licence


Domaine public

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Stefan Michiels, Nils Ternès, Federico Rotolo. Statistical controversies in clinical research: prognostic gene signatures are not (yet) useful in clinical practice. Annals of Oncology, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2016, 27 (12), pp.2160 - 2167. 〈10.1093/annonc/mdw307〉. 〈inserm-01498783〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

145

Téléchargements de fichiers

50