AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading, Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol.17, issue.2, pp.455-61, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jcc.21334
istar: A Web Platform for Large-Scale Protein-Ligand Docking, PLoS ONE, vol.49, issue.1, p.85678, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0085678.s008
Machine-learning scoring functions to improve structure-based binding affinity prediction and virtual screening, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, vol.6, issue.6, pp.405-429, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1002/wcms.1225
A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking, Bioinformatics, vol.26, issue.9, pp.1169-75, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq112
Does a More Precise Chemical Description of Protein???Ligand Complexes Lead to More Accurate Prediction of Binding Affinity?, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.54, issue.3, pp.944-55, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci500091r
Improving AutoDock Vina Using Random Forest: The Growing Accuracy of Binding Affinity Prediction by the Effective Exploitation of Larger Data Sets, Molecular Informatics, vol.50, issue.2-3, pp.2-3115, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1002/minf.201400132
Substituting random forest for multiple linear regression improves binding affinity prediction of scoring functions: Cyscore as a case study, BMC Bioinformatics, vol.15, issue.1, p.291, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1186/1471-2105-15-291
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-01097969
Hierarchical virtual screening for the discovery of new molecular scaffolds in antibacterial hit identification, Journal of The Royal Society Interface, vol.14, issue.3, pp.3196-207, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.03.024
Low-Quality Structural and Interaction Data Improves Binding Affinity Prediction via Random Forest, Molecules, vol.20, issue.6, pp.10947-62, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.3390/molecules200610947
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01205333
Robust Scoring Functions for Protein???Ligand Interactions with Quantum Chemical Charge Models, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.51, issue.10, pp.2528-2565, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci200220v
Random Forests, Machine Learning, vol.45, issue.1, pp.5-32, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1010933404324
Machine Learning Scoring Functions Based on Random Forest and Support Vector Regression, In: Pattern Recognition in Bioinformatics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.7632, pp.14-25, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-34123-6_2
Classification and Regression Trees, 1984. ,
Random Forest:??? A Classification and Regression Tool for Compound Classification and QSAR Modeling, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, vol.43, issue.6, pp.1947-58, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci034160g
Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on a Diverse Test Set, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.49, issue.4, pp.1079-93, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci9000053
: A Random Forest-Based Scoring Function for Improved Affinity Prediction of Protein???Ligand Complexes, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol.53, issue.8, pp.1923-1956, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1021/ci400120b
iview: an interactive WebGL visualizer for protein-ligand complex, BMC Bioinformatics, vol.15, issue.1, p.56, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1126/science.1241475